TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved ENSO forecasting using Bayesian updating and the North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME)
AU - Zhang, Wei
AU - Villarini, Gabriele
AU - Slater, Louise
AU - Vecchi, Gabriel Andres
AU - Allen Bradley, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - This study assesses the forecast skill of eight North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) models in predicting Niño-3/-3.4 indices and improves their skill using Bayesian updating (BU). The forecast skill that is obtained using the ensemble mean of NMME (NMME-EM) shows a strong dependence on lead (initial) month and target month and is quite promising in terms of correlation, root-mean-square error (RMSE), standard deviation ratio (SDRatio), and probabilistic Brier skill score, especially at short lead months. However, the skill decreases in target months from late spring to summer owing to the spring predictability barrier. When BU is applied to eight NMME models (BU-Model), the forecasts tend to outperform NMME-EM in predicting Niño-3/-3.4 in terms of correlation, RMSE, and SDRatio. For Niño-3.4, the BU-Model outperforms NMME-EM forecasts for almost all leads (1-12; particularly for short leads) and target months (from January to December). However, for Niño-3, the BU-Model does not outperform NMME-EM forecasts for leads 7-11 and target months from June to October in terms of correlation and RMSE. Last, the authors test further potential improvements by preselecting "good" models (BU-Model-0.3) and by using principal component analysis to remove the multicollinearity among models, but these additional methodologies do not outperform the BU-Model, which produces the best forecasts of Niño-3/-3.4 for the 2015/16 El Niño event.
AB - This study assesses the forecast skill of eight North American Multimodel Ensemble (NMME) models in predicting Niño-3/-3.4 indices and improves their skill using Bayesian updating (BU). The forecast skill that is obtained using the ensemble mean of NMME (NMME-EM) shows a strong dependence on lead (initial) month and target month and is quite promising in terms of correlation, root-mean-square error (RMSE), standard deviation ratio (SDRatio), and probabilistic Brier skill score, especially at short lead months. However, the skill decreases in target months from late spring to summer owing to the spring predictability barrier. When BU is applied to eight NMME models (BU-Model), the forecasts tend to outperform NMME-EM in predicting Niño-3/-3.4 in terms of correlation, RMSE, and SDRatio. For Niño-3.4, the BU-Model outperforms NMME-EM forecasts for almost all leads (1-12; particularly for short leads) and target months (from January to December). However, for Niño-3, the BU-Model does not outperform NMME-EM forecasts for leads 7-11 and target months from June to October in terms of correlation and RMSE. Last, the authors test further potential improvements by preselecting "good" models (BU-Model-0.3) and by using principal component analysis to remove the multicollinearity among models, but these additional methodologies do not outperform the BU-Model, which produces the best forecasts of Niño-3/-3.4 for the 2015/16 El Niño event.
KW - Bayesian methods
KW - Climate models
KW - El Nino
KW - Seasonal forecasting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032263385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032263385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0073.1
DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0073.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032263385
SN - 0894-8755
VL - 30
SP - 9007
EP - 9025
JO - Journal of Climate
JF - Journal of Climate
IS - 22
ER -