TY - JOUR
T1 - Impacts of EPA's finalized power plant greenhouse gas standards
AU - Bistline, John
AU - Bergman, Aaron
AU - Blanford, Geoffrey
AU - Brown, Maxwell
AU - Burtraw, Dallas
AU - Domeshek, Maya
AU - Fawcett, Allen
AU - Hamilton, Anne
AU - Iyer, Gokul
AU - Jenkins, Jesse
AU - King, Ben
AU - Kolus, Hannah
AU - Levin, Amanda
AU - Luo, Qian
AU - Rennert, Kevin
AU - Robertson, Molly
AU - Roy, Nicholas
AU - Russell, Ethan
AU - Shawhan, Daniel
AU - Steinberg, Daniel
AU - van Brummen, Anna
AU - Van Horn, Grace
AU - Venkatesh, Aranya
AU - Weyant, John
AU - Wiser, Ryan
AU - Zhao, Alicia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/1/10
Y1 - 2025/1/10
N2 - The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidizes the deployment of clean electricity, hydrogen production, and carbon capture and storage (CCS), which could enable additional actions by other federal, state, and local policy-makers to reduce emissions. Power plant rules finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2024 are one such example of complementary policies. The rules establish emissions intensity standards, not technology mandates, meaning power plant owners can choose from a range of technologies and control options provided that emissions standards are met. This flexibility makes electricity systems modeling important to understand the potential effects of these regulations. We report below a multimodel analysis of the EPA power plant rules that can provide timely information, including for other countries and states, on emissions impacts, policy design for electricity decarbonization, power sector investments and retirements, cost impacts, and load growth. We also discuss related technical, political, and legal uncertainties.
AB - The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidizes the deployment of clean electricity, hydrogen production, and carbon capture and storage (CCS), which could enable additional actions by other federal, state, and local policy-makers to reduce emissions. Power plant rules finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2024 are one such example of complementary policies. The rules establish emissions intensity standards, not technology mandates, meaning power plant owners can choose from a range of technologies and control options provided that emissions standards are met. This flexibility makes electricity systems modeling important to understand the potential effects of these regulations. We report below a multimodel analysis of the EPA power plant rules that can provide timely information, including for other countries and states, on emissions impacts, policy design for electricity decarbonization, power sector investments and retirements, cost impacts, and load growth. We also discuss related technical, political, and legal uncertainties.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214911369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85214911369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1126/science.adt5665
DO - 10.1126/science.adt5665
M3 - Article
C2 - 39787230
AN - SCOPUS:85214911369
SN - 0036-8075
VL - 387
SP - 140
EP - 143
JO - Science
JF - Science
IS - 6730
ER -