TY - JOUR
T1 - Illustrating membrane-dominated regimes in pressurized thin shells
AU - Niewiarowski, Alexander
AU - Adriaenssens, Sigrid
AU - Pauletti, Ruy Marcelo
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for funding provided by the Council for International Teaching and Research, the Global Collaborative Network: ROBELARCH, and the High Meadows Environmental Institute at Princeton University. They also thank Prof. B. Glisic at Princeton University for insightful discussions on the topic.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 by Alexander Niewiarowski, Sigrid Adriaenssens and Ruy Marcelo Pauletti.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Pressurized thin-wall structures cover a broad range of applications, including storage tanks, pressurized rubber flood barriers, and large span enclosures. To accurately model such structures, the analyst must select the appropriate mechanical formulation (e.g. membrane vs shell). Membranes are assumed to have negligible bending stiffness and respond to compression by wrinkling; shells resist axial compression (before buckling) and bending efficiently. While theoretical research on these differences is vast, this study aims to explicitly clarify the consequences of this choice and permit a comparison of error between membrane and shell formulations. Therefore, this paper presents a parametric study of canonical pressurized thin-wall structural geometries (i.e. semi-cylinder, hemisphere) to illustrate the transitions between membrane and bending dominant behavior. The mathematical models of a pneumatic 5-parameter shell and membrane are presented and employed to quantify the effects of variables such as thickness and geometry on the amount of membrane, bending, and shear energy. The effects of inflation pressure, self-weight, and hydrostatic loads are also considered. The graphical results, presented in terms of dimensionless quantities in the design space, are general and should be of interest to the theorist and practitioner alike.
AB - Pressurized thin-wall structures cover a broad range of applications, including storage tanks, pressurized rubber flood barriers, and large span enclosures. To accurately model such structures, the analyst must select the appropriate mechanical formulation (e.g. membrane vs shell). Membranes are assumed to have negligible bending stiffness and respond to compression by wrinkling; shells resist axial compression (before buckling) and bending efficiently. While theoretical research on these differences is vast, this study aims to explicitly clarify the consequences of this choice and permit a comparison of error between membrane and shell formulations. Therefore, this paper presents a parametric study of canonical pressurized thin-wall structural geometries (i.e. semi-cylinder, hemisphere) to illustrate the transitions between membrane and bending dominant behavior. The mathematical models of a pneumatic 5-parameter shell and membrane are presented and employed to quantify the effects of variables such as thickness and geometry on the amount of membrane, bending, and shear energy. The effects of inflation pressure, self-weight, and hydrostatic loads are also considered. The graphical results, presented in terms of dimensionless quantities in the design space, are general and should be of interest to the theorist and practitioner alike.
KW - FEniCS
KW - Finite-element modeling
KW - Pressurized thin shells
KW - Shell behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111996290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111996290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20898/j.iass.2021.017
DO - 10.20898/j.iass.2021.017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111996290
SN - 1028-365X
VL - 62
SP - 125
EP - 137
JO - Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures
JF - Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures
IS - 2
ER -