TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results
T2 - Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions
AU - Li, Xiangchong
AU - Zhang, Tianqing
AU - Sugiyama, Sunao
AU - Dalal, Roohi
AU - Terasawa, Ryo
AU - Rau, Markus M.
AU - Mandelbaum, Rachel
AU - Takada, Masahiro
AU - More, Surhud
AU - Strauss, Michael A.
AU - Miyatake, Hironao
AU - Shirasaki, Masato
AU - Hamana, Takashi
AU - Oguri, Masamune
AU - Luo, Wentao
AU - Nishizawa, Atsushi J.
AU - Takahashi, Ryuichi
AU - Nicola, Andrina
AU - Osato, Ken
AU - Kannawadi, Arun
AU - Sunayama, Tomomi
AU - Armstrong, Robert
AU - Bosch, James
AU - Komiyama, Yutaka
AU - Lupton, Robert H.
AU - Lust, Nate B.
AU - Macarthur, Lauren A.
AU - Miyazaki, Satoshi
AU - Murayama, Hitoshi
AU - Nishimichi, Takahiro
AU - Okura, Yuki
AU - Price, Paul A.
AU - Tait, Philip J.
AU - Tanaka, Masayuki
AU - Wang, Shiang Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Physical Society.
PY - 2023/12/15
Y1 - 2023/12/15
N2 - We perform a blinded cosmology analysis with cosmic shear two-point correlation functions measured from more than 25 million galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam three-year shear catalog in four tomographic redshift bins ranging from 0.3 to 1.5. After conservative masking and galaxy selection, the survey covers 416 deg2 of the northern sky with an effective galaxy number density of 15 arcmin-2 over the four redshift bins. The 2PCFs adopted for cosmology analysis are measured in the angular range; 7.1<θ/arcmin<56.6 for ζ+ and 31.2<θ/arcmin<248 for ζ-, with a total signal-to-noise ratio of 26.6. We apply a conservative, wide, flat prior on the photometric redshift errors on the last two tomographic bins, and the relative magnitudes of the cosmic shear amplitude across four redshift bins allow us to calibrate the photometric redshift errors. With this flat prior on redshift errors, we find ωm=0.256-0.044+0.056 and S8σ8ωm/0.3=0.769-0.034+0.031 (both 68% C.I.) for a flat Λ cold dark matter cosmology. We find, after unblinding, that our constraint on S8 is consistent with the Fourier space cosmic shear and the 3×2 pt analyses on the same HSC dataset. We carefully study the potential systematics from astrophysical and systematic model uncertainties in our fiducial analysis using synthetic data, and report no biases (including projection bias in the posterior space) greater than 0.5σ in the estimation of S8. Our analysis hints that the mean redshifts of the two highest tomographic bins are higher than initially estimated. In addition, a number of consistency tests are conducted to assess the robustness of our analysis. Comparing our result with Planck-2018 cosmic microwave background observations, we find a ∼2σ tension for the ΛCDM model.
AB - We perform a blinded cosmology analysis with cosmic shear two-point correlation functions measured from more than 25 million galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam three-year shear catalog in four tomographic redshift bins ranging from 0.3 to 1.5. After conservative masking and galaxy selection, the survey covers 416 deg2 of the northern sky with an effective galaxy number density of 15 arcmin-2 over the four redshift bins. The 2PCFs adopted for cosmology analysis are measured in the angular range; 7.1<θ/arcmin<56.6 for ζ+ and 31.2<θ/arcmin<248 for ζ-, with a total signal-to-noise ratio of 26.6. We apply a conservative, wide, flat prior on the photometric redshift errors on the last two tomographic bins, and the relative magnitudes of the cosmic shear amplitude across four redshift bins allow us to calibrate the photometric redshift errors. With this flat prior on redshift errors, we find ωm=0.256-0.044+0.056 and S8σ8ωm/0.3=0.769-0.034+0.031 (both 68% C.I.) for a flat Λ cold dark matter cosmology. We find, after unblinding, that our constraint on S8 is consistent with the Fourier space cosmic shear and the 3×2 pt analyses on the same HSC dataset. We carefully study the potential systematics from astrophysical and systematic model uncertainties in our fiducial analysis using synthetic data, and report no biases (including projection bias in the posterior space) greater than 0.5σ in the estimation of S8. Our analysis hints that the mean redshifts of the two highest tomographic bins are higher than initially estimated. In addition, a number of consistency tests are conducted to assess the robustness of our analysis. Comparing our result with Planck-2018 cosmic microwave background observations, we find a ∼2σ tension for the ΛCDM model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179820553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85179820553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123518
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123518
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85179820553
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 108
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 12
M1 - 123518
ER -