TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results
T2 - Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra
AU - Dalal, Roohi
AU - Li, Xiangchong
AU - Nicola, Andrina
AU - Zuntz, Joe
AU - Strauss, Michael A.
AU - Sugiyama, Sunao
AU - Zhang, Tianqing
AU - Rau, Markus M.
AU - Mandelbaum, Rachel
AU - Takada, Masahiro
AU - More, Surhud
AU - Miyatake, Hironao
AU - Kannawadi, Arun
AU - Shirasaki, Masato
AU - Taniguchi, Takanori
AU - Takahashi, Ryuichi
AU - Osato, Ken
AU - Hamana, Takashi
AU - Oguri, Masamune
AU - Nishizawa, Atsushi J.
AU - Malagón, Andrés A.Plazas
AU - Sunayama, Tomomi
AU - Alonso, David
AU - Slosar, Anže
AU - Luo, Wentao
AU - Armstrong, Robert
AU - Bosch, James
AU - Hsieh, Bau Ching
AU - Komiyama, Yutaka
AU - Lupton, Robert H.
AU - Lust, Nate B.
AU - Macarthur, Lauren A.
AU - Miyazaki, Satoshi
AU - Murayama, Hitoshi
AU - Nishimichi, Takahiro
AU - Okura, Yuki
AU - Price, Paul A.
AU - Tait, Philip J.
AU - Tanaka, Masayuki
AU - Wang, Shiang Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Physical Society.
PY - 2023/12/15
Y1 - 2023/12/15
N2 - We measure weak lensing cosmic shear power spectra from the 3-year galaxy shear catalog of the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program imaging survey. The shear catalog covers 416 deg2 of the northern sky, with a mean i-band seeing of 0.59 arcsec and an effective galaxy number density of 15 arcmin-2 within our adopted redshift range. With an i-band magnitude limit of 24.5 mag, and four tomographic redshift bins spanning 0.3≤zph≤1.5 based on photometric redshifts, we obtain a high-significance measurement of the cosmic shear power spectra, with a signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 26.4 in the multipole range 300<ℓ<1800. The accuracy of our power spectrum measurement is tested against realistic mock shear catalogs, and we use these catalogs to get a reliable measurement of the covariance of the power spectrum measurements. We use a robust blinding procedure to avoid confirmation bias, and model various uncertainties and sources of bias in our analysis, including point spread function systematics, redshift distribution uncertainties, the intrinsic alignment of galaxies and the modeling of the matter power spectrum. For a flat ΛCDM model, we find S8σ8(ωm/0.3)0.5=0.776-0.033+0.032, which is in excellent agreement with the constraints from the other HSC Year 3 cosmology analyses, as well as those from a number of other cosmic shear experiments. This result implies a ∼2σ-level tension with the Planck 2018 cosmology. We study the effect that various systematic errors and modeling choices could have on this value, and find that they can shift the best-fit value of S8 by no more than ∼0.5σ, indicating that our result is robust to such systematics.
AB - We measure weak lensing cosmic shear power spectra from the 3-year galaxy shear catalog of the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program imaging survey. The shear catalog covers 416 deg2 of the northern sky, with a mean i-band seeing of 0.59 arcsec and an effective galaxy number density of 15 arcmin-2 within our adopted redshift range. With an i-band magnitude limit of 24.5 mag, and four tomographic redshift bins spanning 0.3≤zph≤1.5 based on photometric redshifts, we obtain a high-significance measurement of the cosmic shear power spectra, with a signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 26.4 in the multipole range 300<ℓ<1800. The accuracy of our power spectrum measurement is tested against realistic mock shear catalogs, and we use these catalogs to get a reliable measurement of the covariance of the power spectrum measurements. We use a robust blinding procedure to avoid confirmation bias, and model various uncertainties and sources of bias in our analysis, including point spread function systematics, redshift distribution uncertainties, the intrinsic alignment of galaxies and the modeling of the matter power spectrum. For a flat ΛCDM model, we find S8σ8(ωm/0.3)0.5=0.776-0.033+0.032, which is in excellent agreement with the constraints from the other HSC Year 3 cosmology analyses, as well as those from a number of other cosmic shear experiments. This result implies a ∼2σ-level tension with the Planck 2018 cosmology. We study the effect that various systematic errors and modeling choices could have on this value, and find that they can shift the best-fit value of S8 by no more than ∼0.5σ, indicating that our result is robust to such systematics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179800844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85179800844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123519
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123519
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85179800844
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 108
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 12
M1 - 123519
ER -