Abstract
In 'THe Human Therory of Motivation' Micheal Smith attempts two takss: he offers an account of the debate about motivation between Humeans and anti-Humeans and he provides arguments that are designed to show that the Humeans win.1 While the paper is of great virtue in clarifying the debate, I believe that it falls short of both its goals. It does not highlight the really central issue between Humeans and anti-Humeans and it does not provide arguments which would settle that issue in favour of the Humean side.Smith makes three points in setting up the debate between Humeans and anti-Humeans.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 530-533 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Mind |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue number | 384 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Oct 1987 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Humeans, anti-humeans, and motivation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver