Abstract
According to the Principle of Sufficient Reason, every fact has an explanation. An important challenge to this principle is that it risks being a counterexample to itself. What explains why everything needs to be explained? My first goal is to distinguish two broad kinds of answers to this question, which I call “Humean Rationalism” and “Non-Humean Rationalism”. My second goal will be to defend the prospects of Humean Rationalism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2563-2576 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 181 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Explanation
- Grounding
- Metaphysics
- The Principle of Sufficient Reason