TY - JOUR
T1 - HSC Year 1 cosmology results with the minimal bias method
T2 - HSC ×bOSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing and BOSS galaxy clustering
AU - Sugiyama, Sunao
AU - Takada, Masahiro
AU - Miyatake, Hironao
AU - Nishimichi, Takahiro
AU - Shirasaki, Masato
AU - Kobayashi, Yosuke
AU - Mandelbaum, Rachel
AU - More, Surhud
AU - Takahashi, Ryuichi
AU - Osato, Ken
AU - Oguri, Masamune
AU - Coupon, Jean
AU - Hikage, Chiaki
AU - Hsieh, Bau Ching
AU - Komiyama, Yutaka
AU - Leauthaud, Alexie
AU - Li, Xiangchong
AU - Luo, Wentao
AU - Lupton, Robert H.
AU - Murayama, Hitoshi
AU - Nishizawa, Atsushi J.
AU - Park, Youngsoo
AU - Price, Paul A.
AU - Simet, Melanie
AU - Speagle, Joshua S.
AU - Strauss, Michael A.
AU - Tanaka, Masayuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Physical Society.
PY - 2022/6/15
Y1 - 2022/6/15
N2 - We present cosmological parameter constraints from a blinded joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing, Δς(R), and the projected correlation function, wp(R), measured from the first-year HSC (HSC-Y1) data and SDSS spectroscopic galaxies over 0.150.75 for the Δς measurements, selected based on their photometric redshifts. As a theoretical template, we use the "minimal bias"model for the cosmological clustering observables for the flat ΛCDM cosmological model. We compare the model predictions with the measurements in each redshift bin on large scales, R>12 and 8h-1 Mpc for Δς(R) and wp(R), respectively, where the perturbation-theory-inspired model is valid. As part of our model, we account for the effect of lensing magnification bias on the Δς measurements. When we employ weak priors on cosmological parameters, without cosmic microwave background (CMB) information, we find S8=0.936-0.086+0.092, σ8=0.85-0.11+0.16, and ωm=0.283-0.035+0.12 (mode and 68% credible interval) for the flat ΛCDM model. Although the central value of S8 appears to be larger than those inferred from other cosmological experiments, we find that the difference is consistent with expected differences due to sample variance, and our results are consistent with the other results to within the statistical uncertainties. When combined with the Planck 2018 likelihood for the primary CMB anisotropy information (TT,TE,EE+lowE), we find S8=0.817-0.021+0.022, σ8=0.892-0.056+0.051, ωm=0.246-0.035+0.045, and the equation-of-state parameter of dark energy, wde=-1.28-0.19+0.20 for the flat wCDM model, which is consistent with the flat ΛCDM model to within the error bars.
AB - We present cosmological parameter constraints from a blinded joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing, Δς(R), and the projected correlation function, wp(R), measured from the first-year HSC (HSC-Y1) data and SDSS spectroscopic galaxies over 0.150.75 for the Δς measurements, selected based on their photometric redshifts. As a theoretical template, we use the "minimal bias"model for the cosmological clustering observables for the flat ΛCDM cosmological model. We compare the model predictions with the measurements in each redshift bin on large scales, R>12 and 8h-1 Mpc for Δς(R) and wp(R), respectively, where the perturbation-theory-inspired model is valid. As part of our model, we account for the effect of lensing magnification bias on the Δς measurements. When we employ weak priors on cosmological parameters, without cosmic microwave background (CMB) information, we find S8=0.936-0.086+0.092, σ8=0.85-0.11+0.16, and ωm=0.283-0.035+0.12 (mode and 68% credible interval) for the flat ΛCDM model. Although the central value of S8 appears to be larger than those inferred from other cosmological experiments, we find that the difference is consistent with expected differences due to sample variance, and our results are consistent with the other results to within the statistical uncertainties. When combined with the Planck 2018 likelihood for the primary CMB anisotropy information (TT,TE,EE+lowE), we find S8=0.817-0.021+0.022, σ8=0.892-0.056+0.051, ωm=0.246-0.035+0.045, and the equation-of-state parameter of dark energy, wde=-1.28-0.19+0.20 for the flat wCDM model, which is consistent with the flat ΛCDM model to within the error bars.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134752303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134752303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123537
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123537
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134752303
SN - 2470-0010
VL - 105
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
IS - 12
M1 - 123537
ER -