How Content Preferences Limit the Reach of Voting Aids

Jonathan Mummolo, Erik Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Voters are often uninformed about the political candidates they choose between. Governments, media outlets, and civic organizations devote substantial resources to correcting these knowledge deficits by creating tools to provide candidate information to voters. Despite the widespread production of these aids, it remains unclear who they reach. We collect validated measures of online voter guide use for more than 40,000 newspaper readers during a state primary election. We show this newspaper-produced voter guide was primarily used by individuals with high levels of political interest and knowledge, a finding in contrast to earlier hypotheses that providing guides directly to voters online would reduce disparities in use based on political interest. A field experiment promoting the voter guide failed to diminish these consumption gaps. These results show that the same content preferences that contribute to an unequal distribution of political knowledge also impede the effectiveness of subsequent efforts to close knowledge gaps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-185
Number of pages27
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science


  • media effects
  • voter knowledge
  • voting aids


Dive into the research topics of 'How Content Preferences Limit the Reach of Voting Aids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this