TY - JOUR
T1 - Housing market responses to transaction Taxes
T2 - Evidence from notches and stimulus in the U.K
AU - Best, Michael Carlos
AU - Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - We investigate housing market responses to transaction taxes using administrative data on all property transactions in the U.K. from 2004 to 2012 combined with quasi-experimental variation from tax notches and tax stimulus. We present two main findings. First, transaction taxes are highly distortionary across a range of margins, causing large distortions to the price, volume, and timing of property transactions. Secondly, temporary transaction tax cuts are an enormously effective form of fiscal stimulus.Atemporary elimination of a 1% transaction tax increased housing market activity by 20% in the short run (due to both timing and extensive responses) and less than half of the stimulus effect was reversed after the tax was reintroduced (due to re-timing). Because of the complementarities between moving house and consumer spending, these stimulus effects translate into extra spending per dollar of tax cut equal to about 1. We interpret our empirical findings in the context of a housing model with downpayment constraints in which leverage amplifies the effects of transaction taxes.
AB - We investigate housing market responses to transaction taxes using administrative data on all property transactions in the U.K. from 2004 to 2012 combined with quasi-experimental variation from tax notches and tax stimulus. We present two main findings. First, transaction taxes are highly distortionary across a range of margins, causing large distortions to the price, volume, and timing of property transactions. Secondly, temporary transaction tax cuts are an enormously effective form of fiscal stimulus.Atemporary elimination of a 1% transaction tax increased housing market activity by 20% in the short run (due to both timing and extensive responses) and less than half of the stimulus effect was reversed after the tax was reintroduced (due to re-timing). Because of the complementarities between moving house and consumer spending, these stimulus effects translate into extra spending per dollar of tax cut equal to about 1. We interpret our empirical findings in the context of a housing model with downpayment constraints in which leverage amplifies the effects of transaction taxes.
KW - Fiscal stimulus
KW - Property taxes
KW - Transaction taxes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040793810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040793810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/restud/rdx032
DO - 10.1093/restud/rdx032
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85040793810
SN - 0034-6527
VL - 85
SP - 157
EP - 193
JO - Review of Economic Studies
JF - Review of Economic Studies
IS - 1
M1 - rdx032
ER -