Abstract
Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 50-65 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Philosophia Mathematica |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1993 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Mathematics
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver