Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions

John P. Burgess

doi:10.1093/philmat/1.1.50

Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions

John P. Burgess

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	50-65
Number of pages	16
Journal	Philosophia Mathematica
Volume	1
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/1.1.50
State	Published - Mar 1993

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Mathematics
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1093/philmat/1.1.50

Cite this

@article{b8aef8778a04470eb667c844f3db1c6c,

title = "Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions",

abstract = "Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.",

author = "Burgess, {John P.}",

year = "1993",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1093/philmat/1.1.50",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "1",

pages = "50--65",

journal = "Philosophia Mathematica",

issn = "0031-8019",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions

AU - Burgess, John P.

PY - 1993/3

Y1 - 1993/3

N2 - Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.

AB - Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748830814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748830814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/philmat/1.1.50

DO - 10.1093/philmat/1.1.50

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748830814

SN - 0031-8019

VL - 1

SP - 50

EP - 65

JO - Philosophia Mathematica

JF - Philosophia Mathematica

IS - 1

ER -

Hintikka et sandu versus frege in re arbitrary functions

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this