Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: What do we gain?

Joshua Akey, L. Jin, M. Xiong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

344 Scopus citations

Abstract

The genetic dissection of complex diseases represents a formidable challenge for modern human genetics. Recently, it has been suggested that linkage disequilibrium (LD) based methods will be a powerful approach for delineating complex disease genes. Most proposed LD test statistics search for association between a single marker and a putative trait locus. However, the power of a single marker association test may suffer because LD information contained in flanking markers is ignored. Intuitively, haplotypes (which can be regarded as a collection of ordered markers) may be more powerful than individual, unorganised markers. In this study, we derive the analytical tools based on standard chi-square statistics to directly investigate and compare the power between multilocus haplotypes and single marker LD tests. More specifically, novel formulas are obtained in order to calculate expected haplotype frequencies of unlimited size. This study demonstrates that the use of haplotypes can significantly improve the power and robustness of mapping disease genes. Additionally, we detail how the power of haplotype based association tests are affected by important population genetic parameters such as the genetic distance between markers and disease locus, mode of disease inheritance, age of trait causing mutation, frequency of associated marker allele, and level of initial LD. Finally, published data from the Hereditary Hemochromatosis disease region is used to illustrate the utility of haplotypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-300
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 5 2001
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: What do we gain?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this