Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

Ole F. Norheim, Rob Baltussen, Mira Johri, Dan Chisholm, Erik Nord, Dan W. Brock, Per Carlsson, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Marion Danis, Marc Fleurbaey, Kjell A. Johansson, Lydia Kapiriri, Peter Littlejohns, Thomas Mbeeli, Krishna D. Rao, Tan Torres Edejer, Dan Wikler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number18
JournalCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 29 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Equity
  • Population health
  • Priority setting
  • Resource allocation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Norheim, O. F., Baltussen, R., Johri, M., Chisholm, D., Nord, E., Brock, D. W., Carlsson, P., Cookson, R., Daniels, N., Danis, M., Fleurbaey, M., Johansson, K. A., Kapiriri, L., Littlejohns, P., Mbeeli, T., Rao, K. D., Edejer, T. T., & Wikler, D. (2014). Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 12(1), [18]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18