Guarding the Guardians: Legislative self-policing and electoral corruption in Victorian Britain

Andrew C. Eggers, Arthur Spirling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We offer an institutional explanation for the dramatic decline in corrupt practices that characterizes British political development in the mass suffrage era. Parliamentary candidates who faced corruption charges were judged by tribunals of sitting MPs until 1868, when this responsibility was passed to the courts. We draw on theory and empirical evidence to demonstrate that delegating responsibility over corruption trials to judges was an important institutional step in cleaning up elections. By focusing on an institutional explanation for Victorian electoral corruption (and its demise), we provide an account that complements the existing literature while offering clearer implications for contemporary policy debates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-370
Number of pages34
JournalQuarterly Journal of Political Science
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guarding the Guardians: Legislative self-policing and electoral corruption in Victorian Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this