Grouping Information for Judgments

Anuj K. Shah, Daniel M. Oppenheimer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume140
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Keywords

  • Cue weighting
  • Information aggregation
  • Judgment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grouping Information for Judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this