Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure

Ramón A. Alvarez, Stephen Wilson Pacala, James J. Winebrake, William L. Chameides, Steven P. Hamburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

333 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natural gas is seen by many as the future of American energy: a fuel that can provide energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the process. However, there has also been confusion about the climate implications of increased use of natural gas for electric power and transportation. We propose and illustrate the use of technology warming potentials as a robust and transparent way to compare the cumulative radiative forcing created by alternative technologies fueled by natural gas and oil or coal by using the best available estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from each fuel cycle (i.e., production, transportation and use). We find that a shift to compressed natural gas vehicles from gasoline or diesel vehicles leads to greater radiative forcing of the climate for 80 or 280 yr, respectively, before beginning to produce benefits. Compressed natural gas vehicles could produce climate benefits on all time frames if the well-to-wheels CH 4 leakage were capped at a level 45-70% below current estimates. By contrast, using natural gas instead of coal for electric power plants can reduce radiative forcing immediately, and reducing CH 4 losses from the production and transportation of natural gas would produce even greater benefits. There is a need for the natural gas industry and science community to help obtain better emissions data and for increased efforts to reduce methane leakage in order to minimize the climate footprint of natural gas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6435-6440
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume109
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 24 2012

Fingerprint

Natural Gas
Methane
Climate
Coal
Gases
Technology
Power Plants
Natural Science Disciplines
Gasoline
Oils

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Alvarez, Ramón A. ; Pacala, Stephen Wilson ; Winebrake, James J. ; Chameides, William L. ; Hamburg, Steven P. / Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012 ; Vol. 109, No. 17. pp. 6435-6440.
@article{2ee2b8cbd1314670aeee1d7acf8d16f8,
title = "Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure",
abstract = "Natural gas is seen by many as the future of American energy: a fuel that can provide energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the process. However, there has also been confusion about the climate implications of increased use of natural gas for electric power and transportation. We propose and illustrate the use of technology warming potentials as a robust and transparent way to compare the cumulative radiative forcing created by alternative technologies fueled by natural gas and oil or coal by using the best available estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from each fuel cycle (i.e., production, transportation and use). We find that a shift to compressed natural gas vehicles from gasoline or diesel vehicles leads to greater radiative forcing of the climate for 80 or 280 yr, respectively, before beginning to produce benefits. Compressed natural gas vehicles could produce climate benefits on all time frames if the well-to-wheels CH 4 leakage were capped at a level 45-70{\%} below current estimates. By contrast, using natural gas instead of coal for electric power plants can reduce radiative forcing immediately, and reducing CH 4 losses from the production and transportation of natural gas would produce even greater benefits. There is a need for the natural gas industry and science community to help obtain better emissions data and for increased efforts to reduce methane leakage in order to minimize the climate footprint of natural gas.",
author = "Alvarez, {Ram{\'o}n A.} and Pacala, {Stephen Wilson} and Winebrake, {James J.} and Chameides, {William L.} and Hamburg, {Steven P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1202407109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "6435--6440",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "17",

}

Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. / Alvarez, Ramón A.; Pacala, Stephen Wilson; Winebrake, James J.; Chameides, William L.; Hamburg, Steven P.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 109, No. 17, 24.04.2012, p. 6435-6440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure

AU - Alvarez, Ramón A.

AU - Pacala, Stephen Wilson

AU - Winebrake, James J.

AU - Chameides, William L.

AU - Hamburg, Steven P.

PY - 2012/4/24

Y1 - 2012/4/24

N2 - Natural gas is seen by many as the future of American energy: a fuel that can provide energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the process. However, there has also been confusion about the climate implications of increased use of natural gas for electric power and transportation. We propose and illustrate the use of technology warming potentials as a robust and transparent way to compare the cumulative radiative forcing created by alternative technologies fueled by natural gas and oil or coal by using the best available estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from each fuel cycle (i.e., production, transportation and use). We find that a shift to compressed natural gas vehicles from gasoline or diesel vehicles leads to greater radiative forcing of the climate for 80 or 280 yr, respectively, before beginning to produce benefits. Compressed natural gas vehicles could produce climate benefits on all time frames if the well-to-wheels CH 4 leakage were capped at a level 45-70% below current estimates. By contrast, using natural gas instead of coal for electric power plants can reduce radiative forcing immediately, and reducing CH 4 losses from the production and transportation of natural gas would produce even greater benefits. There is a need for the natural gas industry and science community to help obtain better emissions data and for increased efforts to reduce methane leakage in order to minimize the climate footprint of natural gas.

AB - Natural gas is seen by many as the future of American energy: a fuel that can provide energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the process. However, there has also been confusion about the climate implications of increased use of natural gas for electric power and transportation. We propose and illustrate the use of technology warming potentials as a robust and transparent way to compare the cumulative radiative forcing created by alternative technologies fueled by natural gas and oil or coal by using the best available estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from each fuel cycle (i.e., production, transportation and use). We find that a shift to compressed natural gas vehicles from gasoline or diesel vehicles leads to greater radiative forcing of the climate for 80 or 280 yr, respectively, before beginning to produce benefits. Compressed natural gas vehicles could produce climate benefits on all time frames if the well-to-wheels CH 4 leakage were capped at a level 45-70% below current estimates. By contrast, using natural gas instead of coal for electric power plants can reduce radiative forcing immediately, and reducing CH 4 losses from the production and transportation of natural gas would produce even greater benefits. There is a need for the natural gas industry and science community to help obtain better emissions data and for increased efforts to reduce methane leakage in order to minimize the climate footprint of natural gas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860169749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860169749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

M3 - Article

C2 - 22493226

AN - SCOPUS:84860169749

VL - 109

SP - 6435

EP - 6440

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 17

ER -