Globalization and the Future of Culture Areas: Melanesianist Anthropology in Transition

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    46 Scopus citations


    In the last decade, anthropology has faced challenges to its self-definition associated both with new worldly circumstances and scholarly trends inside and outside the discipline. Recent interest in globalization has provoked discussion concerning what anthropology should be about, how it might be done, and what its relationships are to other bodies of literature and knowledge practices. Unsettling questions have been raised about working concepts of culture, ethnography, the field, fieldwork, and comparative analysis. Extending the rethinking of "place" in anthropology begun by Appadurai, I consider the future of "culture areas" as discursive frameworks for organizing disciplinary practices. Some characteristics of anthropological regionalism are located by contrasting them to interdisciplinary area studies, insofar as globalization poses apparently similar challenges to each. Because of its iconic disciplinary status as an exemplar of "real" anthropology, Melanesianist ethnography is given extended consideration as a particularly interesting case.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)427-449
    Number of pages23
    JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
    StatePublished - 1998

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Cultural Studies
    • Anthropology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


    • Comparison
    • Marginality
    • Melanesia
    • Place


    Dive into the research topics of 'Globalization and the Future of Culture Areas: Melanesianist Anthropology in Transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this