TY - JOUR
T1 - Global comparison of core-collapse supernova simulations in spherical symmetry
AU - O'Connor, Evan
AU - Bollig, Robert
AU - Burrows, Adam S.
AU - Couch, Sean
AU - Fischer, Tobias
AU - Janka, Hans Thomas
AU - Kotake, Kei
AU - Lentz, Eric J.
AU - Liebendörfer, Matthias
AU - Messer, O. E.Bronson
AU - Mezzacappa, Anthony
AU - Takiwaki, Tomoya
AU - Vartanyan, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2018/9/14
Y1 - 2018/9/14
N2 - We present a comparison between several simulation codes designed to study the core-collapse supernova mechanism. We pay close attention to controlling the initial conditions and input physics in order to ensure a meaningful and informative comparison. Our goal is three-fold. First, we aim to demonstrate the current level of agreement between various groups studying the core-collapse supernova central engine. Second, we desire to form a strong basis for future simulation codes and methods to compare to. Lastly, we want this work to be a stepping stone for future work exploring more complex simulations of core-collapse supernovae, i.e., simulations in multiple dimensions and simulations with modern neutrino and nuclear physics. We compare the early (first ∼500 ms after core bounce) spherically-symmetric evolution of a 20 M progenitor star from six different core-collapse supernovae codes: 3DnSNe-IDSA, AGILE-BOLTZTRAN, FLASH, Fornax, GR1D, and PROMETHEUS-VERTEX. Given the diversity of neutrino transport and hydrodynamic methods employed, we find excellent agreement in many critical quantities, including the shock radius evolution and the amount of neutrino heating. Our results provide an excellent starting point from which to extend this comparison to higher dimensions and compare the development of hydrodynamic instabilities that are crucial to the supernova explosion mechanism, such as turbulence and convection.
AB - We present a comparison between several simulation codes designed to study the core-collapse supernova mechanism. We pay close attention to controlling the initial conditions and input physics in order to ensure a meaningful and informative comparison. Our goal is three-fold. First, we aim to demonstrate the current level of agreement between various groups studying the core-collapse supernova central engine. Second, we desire to form a strong basis for future simulation codes and methods to compare to. Lastly, we want this work to be a stepping stone for future work exploring more complex simulations of core-collapse supernovae, i.e., simulations in multiple dimensions and simulations with modern neutrino and nuclear physics. We compare the early (first ∼500 ms after core bounce) spherically-symmetric evolution of a 20 M progenitor star from six different core-collapse supernovae codes: 3DnSNe-IDSA, AGILE-BOLTZTRAN, FLASH, Fornax, GR1D, and PROMETHEUS-VERTEX. Given the diversity of neutrino transport and hydrodynamic methods employed, we find excellent agreement in many critical quantities, including the shock radius evolution and the amount of neutrino heating. Our results provide an excellent starting point from which to extend this comparison to higher dimensions and compare the development of hydrodynamic instabilities that are crucial to the supernova explosion mechanism, such as turbulence and convection.
KW - code comparison
KW - core-collapse supernovae
KW - neutrino transport
KW - neutron stars
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053404054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053404054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6471/aadeae
DO - 10.1088/1361-6471/aadeae
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053404054
SN - 0954-3899
VL - 45
JO - Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
JF - Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
IS - 10
M1 - 104001
ER -