Abstract
Prominent recent scholarship in global political justice has focused on creating conceptual space for international NGOs-and sometimes also corporations and states-as fully-fledged participants in global governance. While acknowledging the achievements of international non-state actors, I argue that core global governance tasks-of global distribution, regulation or administration-should not be assigned to them. Drawing from neo-republican theory, I contend that such actors fall short of the formal criteria that are necessary for constituting a global public actor, because they do not have a global function and orientation. The distinction between public and private actors matters, since it conditions our expectations for them: both categories of actors are asked to avoid dominating individuals, but public actors must, in addition, protect individuals from third-party domination.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 535-551 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Global governance
- NGOs
- Public vs. private