TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender differences in children's reactions to success and failure with computers
AU - Nelson, Lori J.
AU - Cooper, Joel
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments -- The preparation of this article and the research reported was supported by a grant from the McDonnell Foundation to Joel Cooper, as well as by a fellowship to Lori Nelson from the National Science Foundation. The authors wish to thank Bob Kraut for his suggestions in the planning stages of this project and Peter Belina, Ann Faranetta, Rowena Gross, Joan Hall, and Mary Ann Opperman for their assistance in the completion of the project. We also wish to acknowledge Dale Miller and Carl Sherrick for their helpful comments.
PY - 1997/5
Y1 - 1997/5
N2 - This study examined an attributional style explanation for gender differences in computer use and attitudes. A total of 127 Grade 5 subjects filled out questionnaires assessing computer experience. Surprisingly, there were no gender differences in liking for computers. However, consistent with previous research, boys thought that they had more ability with computers, boys used computers more frequently, and more boys had computers at home. Subjects were then randomly assigned to use either a "failure" computer program, a "success" program, or no program. Results showed that boys provided unstable attributions for failure with the computer (e.g., bad disk, lack of effort) more often than girls did, whereas girls provided unstable attributions for success (e.g., easy program, effort) with the computer more often than boys did. Both boys and girls who made stable attributions for success or unstable attributions for failure were more enthusiastic about using computers in the future, indicating that gender differences in attitudes toward computer use can be explained by gender differences in attributions for performance. The data also suggest that gender differences in relaxation and expectations for improvement were due to gender differences in stability of attributions, frequency of previous computer use, and perceived competence with computers.
AB - This study examined an attributional style explanation for gender differences in computer use and attitudes. A total of 127 Grade 5 subjects filled out questionnaires assessing computer experience. Surprisingly, there were no gender differences in liking for computers. However, consistent with previous research, boys thought that they had more ability with computers, boys used computers more frequently, and more boys had computers at home. Subjects were then randomly assigned to use either a "failure" computer program, a "success" program, or no program. Results showed that boys provided unstable attributions for failure with the computer (e.g., bad disk, lack of effort) more often than girls did, whereas girls provided unstable attributions for success (e.g., easy program, effort) with the computer more often than boys did. Both boys and girls who made stable attributions for success or unstable attributions for failure were more enthusiastic about using computers in the future, indicating that gender differences in attitudes toward computer use can be explained by gender differences in attributions for performance. The data also suggest that gender differences in relaxation and expectations for improvement were due to gender differences in stability of attributions, frequency of previous computer use, and perceived competence with computers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031130378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031130378&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00008-3
DO - 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00008-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031130378
SN - 0747-5632
VL - 13
SP - 247
EP - 267
JO - Computers in Human Behavior
JF - Computers in Human Behavior
IS - 2
ER -