Galaxy mergers and gravitational lens statistics

Hans Walter Rix, Dan Maoz, Edwin L. Turner, Masataka Fukugita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

We investigate the impact of hierarchical galaxy merging on the statistics of gravitational lensing of distant sources. Since no definite theoretical predictions for the merging history of luminous galaxies exist, we adopt a parameterized prescription, which allows us to adjust the expected number of pieces comprising a typical present galaxy at z ∼ 0.65. The existence of global parameter relations for elliptical galaxies and constraints on the evolution of the phase space density in dissipationless mergers, allow us to limit the possible evolution of galaxy lens properties under merging. We draw two lessons from implementing this lens evolution into statistical lens calculations: (1) The total optical depth to multiple imaging (e.g., of quasars) is quite insensitive to merging. (2) Merging leads to a smaller mean separation of observed multiple images. Because merging does not reduce drastically the expected lensing frequency, it cannot make λ-dominated cosmologies compatible with the existing lensing observations. A comparison with the data from the HST Snapshot Survey shows that models with little or no evolution of the lens population are statistically favored over strong merging scenarios. A specific merging scenario proposed to Toomre can be rejected (95% level) by such a comparison. Some versions of the scenario proposed by Broadhurst, Ellis, & Glazebrook are statistically acceptable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-54
Number of pages6
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume435
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1994

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Keywords

  • Galaxies: clustering
  • Galaxies: interactions
  • Gravitational lensing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Galaxy mergers and gravitational lens statistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this