Abstract
I consider the debate between those who believe in microphysical reductionism, and those who believe in the irreducibility of macroscopic objects. I consider, in particular, recent arguments that physics itself refutes the hypothesis of reductionism – from, among others, George Ellis and Barbara Drossel. I raise some questions about the effectiveness of these arguments, and I suggest that this debate is based on an unclear, but emotionally fraught, understanding of what “reduction” means.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-47 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Scientia et Fides |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
Keywords
- emergence
- microphysics
- physicalism
- quantum mechanics
- reductionism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fundamental Physics and Middle-Sized Dry Goods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver