From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets

Mina Cikara, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, Susan T. Fiske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

224 Scopus citations

Abstract

Agency attribution is a hallmark of mind perception; thus, diminished attributions of agency may disrupt social-cognition processes typically elicited by human targets. The current studies examine the effect of perceivers' sexist attitudes on associations of agency with, and neural responses to, images of sexualized and clothed men and women. In Study 1, male ( but not female) participants with higher hostile sexism scores more quickly associated sexualized women with first-person action verbs ("handle") and clothed women with third-person action verbs ("handles") than the inverse, as compared to their less sexist peers. In Study 2, hostile sexism correlated negatively with activation of regions associated with mental state attribution-medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, temporal poles-but onlywhen viewing sexualized women. Heterosexual men best recognized images of sexualized female bodies (but not faces), as compared with other targets' bodies; however, neither face nor body recognition was related to hostile sexism, suggesting that the fMRI findings are not explained by more or less attention to sexualized female targets. Diminished mental state attribution is not unique to targets that people prefer to avoid, as in dehumanization of stigmatized people. The current studies demonstrate that appetitive social targets may elicit a similar response depending on perceivers' attitudes toward them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-551
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of cognitive neuroscience
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this