Frequency distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae in human populations and its relationships with age and sex

P. K. Das, A. Manoharan, A. Srividya, B. T. Grenfell, D. A.P. Bundy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of host age and sex on the frequency distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti infections in the human host. Microfilaria! counts from a large data base on the epidemiology of bancroftian filariasis in Pondicherry, South India are analysed. Frequency distributions of microfilarial counts divided by age are successfully described by zero-truncated negative binomial distributions, fitted by maximum likelihood. Parameter estimates from the fits indicate a significant trend of decreasing overdispersion with age in the distributions above age 10; this pattern provides indirect evidence for the operation of density-dependent constraints on microfilaria! intensity. The analysis also provides estimates of the proportion of mf-positive individuals who are identified as negative due to sampling errors (around 5 % of the total negatives). This allows the construction of corrected mf age-prevalence curves, which indicate that the observed prevalence may underestimate the true figures by between 25 % and 100 %. The age distribution of mf-negative individuals in the population is discussed in terms of current hypotheses about the interaction between disease and infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-434
Number of pages6
JournalParasitology
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1990
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Parasitology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Infectious Diseases

Keywords

  • Wuchereria bancrofti
  • age distribution
  • density dependence
  • lymphatic filariasis
  • sex distribution
  • truncated negative binomial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency distribution of Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae in human populations and its relationships with age and sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this