Abstract
Sallust's account of Catiline's first speech contains a verbal echo of Cicero's First Catilinarian (BC 20.9 ∼ Cat. 1.1). By raising the question of whether Catiline or Cicero counts as the author of the phrase, Sallust invites attention to the double nature of historiography as at once a literary representation of reality and a part of the historical processes it documents. Hearing Catiline as author points up the historicity of texts: the phrase itself changes meaning and significance as it is appropriated by a sequence of authors. An awareness of Cicero as source recalls the textuality of history: the struggles to control the meaning of actions and language staged through intertextuality overlap with actual political conflicts.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 49-66 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | American Journal of Philology |
| Volume | 134 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Classics
- Cultural Studies
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Free spirits: Sallust and the citation of Catiline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver