First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations

K. C. Hartstein, S. Saleki, K. Ziman, P. Cavanagh, P. U. Tse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When one figure is replaced with another that overlaps its spatial location, observers perceive an illusory, continuous shape change of the original object, a phenomenon known as transformational apparent motion (TAM). The current study investigated the extent to which TAM depends on a common, high-level shape representation that is independent of the shape-defining attribute. Specifically, we tested whether TAM is perceived similarly for both first- and second-order objects, defined by luminance and texture contrast, respectively. A compelling motion percept was observed in second-order TAM displays that was comparable to that seen in first-order TAM displays. Importantly, TAM for both stimulus classes showed the same pattern over a range of stimulus onset asynchronies. These results support the high-level shape account, indicating that TAM is driven by segmentation mechanisms that rely on high-level shape information rather than low-level visual characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-250
Number of pages5
JournalVision Research
Volume188
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Keywords

  • Motion perception
  • Psychophysics
  • Second-order stimulus
  • Transformational apparent motion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this