Filming images or filming reality: The life cycles of important movie directors from D.W. Griffith to Federico Fellini

David W. Galenson, Joshua Kotin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Why have some movie directors made important films early in their careers but subsequently failed to match their initial successes, whereas other directors have begun much more modestly but have made great movies late in life? The authors demonstrate that the answer lies in the directors' motivations and in the nature of their films. Conceptual directors, who use their films to express ideas or emotions, mature early; thus, such great conceptual innovators as D. W. Griffith, Buster Keaton, Sergei Eisenstein, and Orson Welles made their major contributions early in their careers and declined thereafter. In contrast, experimental directors, whose films present realistic characters in convincing situations, improve their techniques with experience, so that such great experimental innovators as Charlie Chaplin, John Ford, Alfred Hitchcock, and Akira Kurosawa made their greatest films later in life. Understanding these contrasting approaches to film provides a new systemic understanding of the creative life cycles of individual directors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-134
Number of pages18
JournalHistorical Methods
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History

Keywords

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • Buster Keaton
  • Charlie Chaplin
  • Jean-Luc Godard
  • John Ford
  • Orson Welles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Filming images or filming reality: The life cycles of important movie directors from D.W. Griffith to Federico Fellini'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this