TY - JOUR
T1 - Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of CO2 and brine leakage along old wells
AU - Celia, Michael Anthony
AU - Nordbotten, Jan M.
AU - Court, Benjamin
AU - Dobossy, Mark
AU - Bachu, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
We have identified a field location where a large-scale CCS activity might reasonably take place in the future. The location is southwest of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, where four large coal-fired power plants currently emit about 30 million tonnes of CO Mt CO . Data have been collected for site characterization in the area outlined in the figure, with the area being 50 km × 50 km. Within that area, 1146 existing oil and gas wells have been identified. The locations of these wells are shown in . Additional information can also be found in 2 per year (Mt CO 2 /yr) ( Michael et al., 2009c ). Furthermore, one of the plant operators intends to implement at a new generation unit a commercial scale demonstration CCS project. The project, designed to capture approximately 1 2 /yr, has received significant financial support from the Alberta provincial government and from the Canadian federal government and is expected to be operational by 2015. The location of our study area is shown in Fig. 4 Fig. 4 . These wells have variable characteristics, including depth of penetration and age. We have also identified the general stratigraphic sequence in the area (shown in Fig. 4 ), which consists of alternating permeable and impermeable layers, with the permeable layers corresponding to sandstones in the higher layers and carbonates in the lower layers. The impermeable caprock formations are shales. The characteristics of the permeable layers, including number of wells, are summarized in Table 1 Michael et al. (2009c) and on the Alberta Geological Survey (AGS) website http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/ .
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant EAR-0934722 ; the Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement RD-83438501 ; the Department of Energy under Award No. DE-FE0001161, CFDA No. 81,089; and the Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton University.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Carbon capture and geological storage (CCS) operations will require an environmental risk analysis to determine, among other things, the risk that injected CO2 or displaced brine will leak from the injection formation into other parts of the subsurface or surface environments. Such an analysis requires site characterization including identification of potential leakage pathways. In North America, the century-long legacy of oil and gas exploration and production has left millions of oil and gas wells, many of which are co-located with otherwise good geological storage sites. Potential leakage along existing wells, coupled with layered stratigraphic sequences and highly uncertain parameters, makes quantitative analysis of leakage risk a significant computational challenge. However, new approaches to modeling CO2 injection, migration, and leakage allow for realistic scenarios to be simulated within a probabilistic framework. Using a specific field site in Alberta, Canada, we perform a range of computational studies aimed at risk analysis with a focus on CO2 and brine leakage along old wells. The specific calculations focus on the injection period, when risk of leakage is expected to be largest. Specifically, we simulate 50 years of injection of supercritical CO2 and use a Monte Carlo framework to analyze the overall system behavior. The simulations involve injection, migration, and leakage over the 50-year time horizon for domains of several thousand square kilometers having multiple layers in the sedimentary succession and several thousand old wells within the domain. Because we can perform each simulation in a few minutes of computer time, we can run tens of thousands of simulations and analyze the outputs in a probabilistic framework. We use these kinds of simulations to demonstrate the importance of residual brine saturations, the range of current options to quantify leaky well properties, and the impact of depth of injection and how it relates to leakage risk.
AB - Carbon capture and geological storage (CCS) operations will require an environmental risk analysis to determine, among other things, the risk that injected CO2 or displaced brine will leak from the injection formation into other parts of the subsurface or surface environments. Such an analysis requires site characterization including identification of potential leakage pathways. In North America, the century-long legacy of oil and gas exploration and production has left millions of oil and gas wells, many of which are co-located with otherwise good geological storage sites. Potential leakage along existing wells, coupled with layered stratigraphic sequences and highly uncertain parameters, makes quantitative analysis of leakage risk a significant computational challenge. However, new approaches to modeling CO2 injection, migration, and leakage allow for realistic scenarios to be simulated within a probabilistic framework. Using a specific field site in Alberta, Canada, we perform a range of computational studies aimed at risk analysis with a focus on CO2 and brine leakage along old wells. The specific calculations focus on the injection period, when risk of leakage is expected to be largest. Specifically, we simulate 50 years of injection of supercritical CO2 and use a Monte Carlo framework to analyze the overall system behavior. The simulations involve injection, migration, and leakage over the 50-year time horizon for domains of several thousand square kilometers having multiple layers in the sedimentary succession and several thousand old wells within the domain. Because we can perform each simulation in a few minutes of computer time, we can run tens of thousands of simulations and analyze the outputs in a probabilistic framework. We use these kinds of simulations to demonstrate the importance of residual brine saturations, the range of current options to quantify leaky well properties, and the impact of depth of injection and how it relates to leakage risk.
KW - Abandoned wells
KW - Geological storage
KW - Leakage
KW - Risk analysis
KW - Semi-analytical solutions
KW - Site characterization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951952166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951952166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.10.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79951952166
SN - 1750-5836
VL - 5
SP - 257
EP - 269
JO - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
JF - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
IS - 2
ER -