Facultative versus obligate nitrogen fixation strategies and their ecosystem consequences

Duncan N L Menge, Simon Asher Levin, Lars O. Hedin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

Symbiotic nitrogen (N) fixers are critical components of many terrestrial ecosystems. There is evidence that some N fixers fix N at the same rate regardless of environmental conditions (a strategy we call obligate), while others adjust N fixation to meet their needs (a strategy we call facultative). Although these strategies are likely to have qualitatively different impacts on their environment, the relative effectiveness and ecosystem-level impacts of each strategy have not been explored. Using a simple mathematical model, we determine the best facultative strategy and show that it excludes any obligate strategy (fixer or nonfixer) in our basic model. To provide an ex-planation for the existence of nonfixers and obligate fixers, we show that both costs of being facultative and time lags inherent in the process of N fixation can select against facultative N fixers and also produce the seemingly paradoxical patterns of sustained N limitation and N richness. Finally, we speculate on why the costs and lags may differ between temperate and tropical regions and thus whether they can explain patterns in both biomes simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-477
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume174
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Keywords

  • Evolutionary ecology
  • Model
  • Nitrogen fixation
  • Nitrogen limitation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Facultative versus obligate nitrogen fixation strategies and their ecosystem consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this