Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion

Richard M. Shiffrin; Dora Matzke; Jonathon D. Crystal; E. J. Wagenmakers; Suyog H. Chandramouli; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Marco Zorzi; Richard D. Morey; Mary C. Murphy

doi:10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5

Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion

Richard M. Shiffrin
, Dora Matzke
, Jonathon D. Crystal
, E. J. Wagenmakers
, Suyog H. Chandramouli
, Joachim Vandekerckhove
, Marco Zorzi
, Richard D. Morey
, Mary C. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Roberts (2020, Learning & Behavior, 48[2], 191–192) discussed research claiming honeybees can do arithmetic. Some readers of this research might regard such claims as unlikely. The present authors used this example as a basis for a debate on the criterion that ought to be used for publication of results or conclusions that could be viewed as unlikely by a significant number of readers, editors, or reviewers.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	265-275
Number of pages	11
Journal	Learning and Behavior
Volume	49
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5
State	Published - Sep 2021
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience

Keywords

Comparative cognition
Evidence
Extraordinary claims
Numerical cognition
Publication criteria

Access to Document

10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5

Cite this

@article{3380308c44bb44bd8a5e0a9442db67d5,

title = "Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion",

abstract = "Roberts (2020, Learning \& Behavior, 48[2], 191–192) discussed research claiming honeybees can do arithmetic. Some readers of this research might regard such claims as unlikely. The present authors used this example as a basis for a debate on the criterion that ought to be used for publication of results or conclusions that could be viewed as unlikely by a significant number of readers, editors, or reviewers.",

keywords = "Comparative cognition, Evidence, Extraordinary claims, Numerical cognition, Publication criteria",

author = "Shiffrin, \{Richard M.\} and Dora Matzke and Crystal, \{Jonathon D.\} and Wagenmakers, \{E. J.\} and Chandramouli, \{Suyog H.\} and Joachim Vandekerckhove and Marco Zorzi and Morey, \{Richard D.\} and Murphy, \{Mary C.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

doi = "10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "49",

pages = "265--275",

journal = "Learning and Behavior",

issn = "1543-4494",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion

AU - Shiffrin, Richard M.

AU - Matzke, Dora

AU - Crystal, Jonathon D.

AU - Wagenmakers, E. J.

AU - Chandramouli, Suyog H.

AU - Vandekerckhove, Joachim

AU - Zorzi, Marco

AU - Morey, Richard D.

AU - Murphy, Mary C.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Roberts (2020, Learning & Behavior, 48[2], 191–192) discussed research claiming honeybees can do arithmetic. Some readers of this research might regard such claims as unlikely. The present authors used this example as a basis for a debate on the criterion that ought to be used for publication of results or conclusions that could be viewed as unlikely by a significant number of readers, editors, or reviewers.

AB - Roberts (2020, Learning & Behavior, 48[2], 191–192) discussed research claiming honeybees can do arithmetic. Some readers of this research might regard such claims as unlikely. The present authors used this example as a basis for a debate on the criterion that ought to be used for publication of results or conclusions that could be viewed as unlikely by a significant number of readers, editors, or reviewers.

KW - Comparative cognition

KW - Evidence

KW - Extraordinary claims

KW - Numerical cognition

KW - Publication criteria

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112199303

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85112199303#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5

DO - 10.3758/s13420-021-00474-5

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 34378175

AN - SCOPUS:85112199303

SN - 1543-4494

VL - 49

SP - 265

EP - 275

JO - Learning and Behavior

JF - Learning and Behavior

IS - 3

ER -

Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence? A discussion

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this