TY - JOUR
T1 - Expression profiling of primary and metastatic ovarian tumors reveals differences indicative of aggressive disease
AU - Brodsky, Alexander S.
AU - Fischer, Andrew
AU - Miller, Daniel H.
AU - Vang, Souriya
AU - MacLaughlan, Shannon
AU - Wu, Hsin Ta
AU - Yu, Jovian
AU - Steinhoff, Margaret
AU - Collins, Colin
AU - Smith, Peter J.S.
AU - Raphael, Benjamin J.
AU - Brard, Laurent
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Brown University Center for Genomics and Proteomics, partially supported by NIH grants P30RR031153, P20RR0118/28 and S10RR027634, NSF 0554548, Lifespan-Rhode Island Hospital and the Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, for Affymetrix microarray processing. We thank all the patients who participated in this study.
PY - 2014/4/14
Y1 - 2014/4/14
N2 - The behavior and genetics of serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) metastasis, the form of the disease lethal to patients, is poorly understood. The unique properties of metastases are critical to understand to improve treatments of the disease that remains in patients after debulking surgery. We sought to identify the genetic and phenotypic landscape of metastatic progression of EOC to understand how metastases compare to primary tumors. DNA copy number and mRNA expression differences between matched primary human tumors and omental metastases, collected at the same time during debulking surgery before chemotherapy, were measured using microarrays. qPCR and immunohistochemistry validated findings. Pathway analysis of mRNA expression revealed metastatic cancer cells are more proliferative and less apoptotic than primary tumors, perhaps explaining the aggressive nature of these lesions. Most cases had copy number aberrations (CNAs) that differed between primary and metastatic tumors, but we did not detect CNAs that are recurrent across cases. A six gene expression signature distinguishes primary from metastatic tumors and predicts overall survival in independent datasets. The genetic differences between primary and metastatic tumors, yet common expression changes, suggest that the major clone in metastases is not the same as in primary tumors, but the cancer cells adapt to the omentum similarly. Together, these data highlight how ovarian tumors develop into a distinct, more aggressive metastatic state that should be considered for therapy development.
AB - The behavior and genetics of serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) metastasis, the form of the disease lethal to patients, is poorly understood. The unique properties of metastases are critical to understand to improve treatments of the disease that remains in patients after debulking surgery. We sought to identify the genetic and phenotypic landscape of metastatic progression of EOC to understand how metastases compare to primary tumors. DNA copy number and mRNA expression differences between matched primary human tumors and omental metastases, collected at the same time during debulking surgery before chemotherapy, were measured using microarrays. qPCR and immunohistochemistry validated findings. Pathway analysis of mRNA expression revealed metastatic cancer cells are more proliferative and less apoptotic than primary tumors, perhaps explaining the aggressive nature of these lesions. Most cases had copy number aberrations (CNAs) that differed between primary and metastatic tumors, but we did not detect CNAs that are recurrent across cases. A six gene expression signature distinguishes primary from metastatic tumors and predicts overall survival in independent datasets. The genetic differences between primary and metastatic tumors, yet common expression changes, suggest that the major clone in metastases is not the same as in primary tumors, but the cancer cells adapt to the omentum similarly. Together, these data highlight how ovarian tumors develop into a distinct, more aggressive metastatic state that should be considered for therapy development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899635321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899635321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0094476
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0094476
M3 - Article
C2 - 24732363
AN - SCOPUS:84899635321
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 9
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 4
M1 - e94476
ER -