Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task

Brian J. Edwards, Joseph J. Williams, Dedre Gentner, Tania Lombrozo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Generating explanations can be highly effective in promoting category learning; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We propose that engaging in explanation can recruit comparison processes, and that this in turn contributes to the effectiveness of explanation in supporting category learning. Three experiments evaluated the interplay between explanation and various comparison strategies in learning artificial categories. In Experiment 1, as expected, prompting participants to explain items’ category membership led to (a) higher ratings of self-reported comparison processing and (b) increased likelihood of discovering a rule underlying category membership. Indeed, prompts to explain led to more self-reported comparison than did direct prompts to compare pairs of items. Experiment 2 showed that prompts to compare all members of a particular category (“group comparison”) were more effective in supporting rule learning than were pairwise comparison prompts. Experiment 3 found that group comparison (as assessed by self-report) partially mediated the relationship between explanation and category learning. These results suggest that one way in which explanation benefits category learning is by inviting comparisons in the service of identifying broad patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-38
Number of pages18
JournalCognition
Volume185
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Keywords

  • Categorisation
  • Comparison
  • Explanation
  • Learning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this