Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task

Brian J. Edwards, Joseph J. Williams, Dedre Gentner, Tania Lombrozo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Generating explanations can be highly effective in promoting category learning; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We propose that engaging in explanation can recruit comparison processes, and that this in turn contributes to the effectiveness of explanation in supporting category learning. Three experiments evaluated the interplay between explanation and various comparison strategies in learning artificial categories. In Experiment 1, as expected, prompting participants to explain items’ category membership led to (a) higher ratings of self-reported comparison processing and (b) increased likelihood of discovering a rule underlying category membership. Indeed, prompts to explain led to more self-reported comparison than did direct prompts to compare pairs of items. Experiment 2 showed that prompts to compare all members of a particular category (“group comparison”) were more effective in supporting rule learning than were pairwise comparison prompts. Experiment 3 found that group comparison (as assessed by self-report) partially mediated the relationship between explanation and category learning. These results suggest that one way in which explanation benefits category learning is by inviting comparisons in the service of identifying broad patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-38
Number of pages18
JournalCognition
Volume185
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Learning
learning
experiment
Self Report
Category Learning
Group
rating
Prompts
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Edwards, Brian J. ; Williams, Joseph J. ; Gentner, Dedre ; Lombrozo, Tania. / Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task. In: Cognition. 2019 ; Vol. 185. pp. 21-38.
@article{751aabdec4c44c8c8bcafd917ebdeadb,
title = "Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task",
abstract = "Generating explanations can be highly effective in promoting category learning; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We propose that engaging in explanation can recruit comparison processes, and that this in turn contributes to the effectiveness of explanation in supporting category learning. Three experiments evaluated the interplay between explanation and various comparison strategies in learning artificial categories. In Experiment 1, as expected, prompting participants to explain items’ category membership led to (a) higher ratings of self-reported comparison processing and (b) increased likelihood of discovering a rule underlying category membership. Indeed, prompts to explain led to more self-reported comparison than did direct prompts to compare pairs of items. Experiment 2 showed that prompts to compare all members of a particular category (“group comparison”) were more effective in supporting rule learning than were pairwise comparison prompts. Experiment 3 found that group comparison (as assessed by self-report) partially mediated the relationship between explanation and category learning. These results suggest that one way in which explanation benefits category learning is by inviting comparisons in the service of identifying broad patterns.",
author = "Edwards, {Brian J.} and Williams, {Joseph J.} and Dedre Gentner and Tania Lombrozo",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "185",
pages = "21--38",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task. / Edwards, Brian J.; Williams, Joseph J.; Gentner, Dedre; Lombrozo, Tania.

In: Cognition, Vol. 185, 01.04.2019, p. 21-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task

AU - Edwards, Brian J.

AU - Williams, Joseph J.

AU - Gentner, Dedre

AU - Lombrozo, Tania

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Generating explanations can be highly effective in promoting category learning; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We propose that engaging in explanation can recruit comparison processes, and that this in turn contributes to the effectiveness of explanation in supporting category learning. Three experiments evaluated the interplay between explanation and various comparison strategies in learning artificial categories. In Experiment 1, as expected, prompting participants to explain items’ category membership led to (a) higher ratings of self-reported comparison processing and (b) increased likelihood of discovering a rule underlying category membership. Indeed, prompts to explain led to more self-reported comparison than did direct prompts to compare pairs of items. Experiment 2 showed that prompts to compare all members of a particular category (“group comparison”) were more effective in supporting rule learning than were pairwise comparison prompts. Experiment 3 found that group comparison (as assessed by self-report) partially mediated the relationship between explanation and category learning. These results suggest that one way in which explanation benefits category learning is by inviting comparisons in the service of identifying broad patterns.

AB - Generating explanations can be highly effective in promoting category learning; however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We propose that engaging in explanation can recruit comparison processes, and that this in turn contributes to the effectiveness of explanation in supporting category learning. Three experiments evaluated the interplay between explanation and various comparison strategies in learning artificial categories. In Experiment 1, as expected, prompting participants to explain items’ category membership led to (a) higher ratings of self-reported comparison processing and (b) increased likelihood of discovering a rule underlying category membership. Indeed, prompts to explain led to more self-reported comparison than did direct prompts to compare pairs of items. Experiment 2 showed that prompts to compare all members of a particular category (“group comparison”) were more effective in supporting rule learning than were pairwise comparison prompts. Experiment 3 found that group comparison (as assessed by self-report) partially mediated the relationship between explanation and category learning. These results suggest that one way in which explanation benefits category learning is by inviting comparisons in the service of identifying broad patterns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059815407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059815407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 21

EP - 38

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -