Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control

Skylar R. Hopkins; Kevin D. Lafferty; Chelsea L. Wood; Sarah H. Olson; Julia C. Buck; Giulio A. De Leo; Kathryn J. Fiorella; Johanna L. Fornberg; Andres Garchitorena; Isabel J. Jones; Armand M. Kuris; Laura H. Kwong; Christopher LeBoa; Ariel E. Leon; Andrea J. Lund; Andrew J. MacDonald; Daniel C.G. Metz; Nicole Nova; Alison J. Peel; Justin V. Remais; Tara E. Stewart Merrill; Maya Wilson; Matthew H. Bonds; Andrew P. Dobson; David Lopez Carr; Meghan E. Howard; Lisa Mandle; Susanne H. Sokolow

doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control

Skylar R. Hopkins, Kevin D. Lafferty, Chelsea L. Wood, Sarah H. Olson, Julia C. Buck, Giulio A. De Leo, Kathryn J. Fiorella, Johanna L. Fornberg, Andres Garchitorena, Isabel J. Jones, Armand M. Kuris, Laura H. Kwong, Christopher LeBoa, Ariel E. Leon, Andrea J. Lund, Andrew J. MacDonald, Daniel C.G. Metz, Nicole Nova, Alison J. Peel, Justin V. RemaisTara E. Stewart Merrill, Maya Wilson, Matthew H. Bonds, Andrew P. Dobson, David Lopez Carr, Meghan E. Howard, Lisa Mandle, Susanne H. Sokolow

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

As sustainable development practitioners have worked to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all” and “conserve life on land and below water”, what progress has been made with win–win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within and among solutions, highlighting opportunities for further research and adaptive implementation. Stakeholders seeking win–win interventions can explore this Review and an online database to find and tailor a relevant solution or brainstorm new solutions.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e694-e705
Journal	The Lancet Planetary Health
Volume	6
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6
State	Published - Aug 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Medicine (miscellaneous)
Health(social science)
Health Policy
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Access to Document

10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

Cite this

Hopkins, S. R., Lafferty, K. D., Wood, C. L., Olson, S. H., Buck, J. C., De Leo, G. A., Fiorella, K. J., Fornberg, J. L., Garchitorena, A., Jones, I. J., Kuris, A. M., Kwong, L. H., LeBoa, C., Leon, A. E., Lund, A. J., MacDonald, A. J., Metz, D. C. G., Nova, N., Peel, A. J., ... Sokolow, S. H. (2022). Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(8), e694-e705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

@article{1ddef147e74b450ca1396a1ba884ba3e,

title = "Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control",

abstract = "As sustainable development practitioners have worked to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all” and “conserve life on land and below water”, what progress has been made with win–win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within and among solutions, highlighting opportunities for further research and adaptive implementation. Stakeholders seeking win–win interventions can explore this Review and an online database to find and tailor a relevant solution or brainstorm new solutions.",

author = "Hopkins, {Skylar R.} and Lafferty, {Kevin D.} and Wood, {Chelsea L.} and Olson, {Sarah H.} and Buck, {Julia C.} and {De Leo}, {Giulio A.} and Fiorella, {Kathryn J.} and Fornberg, {Johanna L.} and Andres Garchitorena and Jones, {Isabel J.} and Kuris, {Armand M.} and Kwong, {Laura H.} and Christopher LeBoa and Leon, {Ariel E.} and Lund, {Andrea J.} and MacDonald, {Andrew J.} and Metz, {Daniel C.G.} and Nicole Nova and Peel, {Alison J.} and Remais, {Justin V.} and {Stewart Merrill}, {Tara E.} and Maya Wilson and Bonds, {Matthew H.} and Dobson, {Andrew P.} and {Lopez Carr}, David and Howard, {Meghan E.} and Lisa Mandle and Sokolow, {Susanne H.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license",

year = "2022",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "6",

pages = "e694--e705",

journal = "The Lancet Planetary Health",

issn = "2542-5196",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "8",

}

Hopkins, SR, Lafferty, KD, Wood, CL, Olson, SH, Buck, JC, De Leo, GA, Fiorella, KJ, Fornberg, JL, Garchitorena, A, Jones, IJ, Kuris, AM, Kwong, LH, LeBoa, C, Leon, AE, Lund, AJ, MacDonald, AJ, Metz, DCG, Nova, N, Peel, AJ, Remais, JV, Stewart Merrill, TE, Wilson, M, Bonds, MH, Dobson, AP, Lopez Carr, D, Howard, ME, Mandle, L & Sokolow, SH 2022, 'Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control', The Lancet Planetary Health, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. e694-e705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control

AU - Hopkins, Skylar R.

AU - Lafferty, Kevin D.

AU - Wood, Chelsea L.

AU - Olson, Sarah H.

AU - Buck, Julia C.

AU - De Leo, Giulio A.

AU - Fiorella, Kathryn J.

AU - Fornberg, Johanna L.

AU - Garchitorena, Andres

AU - Jones, Isabel J.

AU - Kuris, Armand M.

AU - Kwong, Laura H.

AU - LeBoa, Christopher

AU - Leon, Ariel E.

AU - Lund, Andrea J.

AU - MacDonald, Andrew J.

AU - Metz, Daniel C.G.

AU - Nova, Nicole

AU - Peel, Alison J.

AU - Remais, Justin V.

AU - Stewart Merrill, Tara E.

AU - Wilson, Maya

AU - Bonds, Matthew H.

AU - Dobson, Andrew P.

AU - Lopez Carr, David

AU - Howard, Meghan E.

AU - Mandle, Lisa

AU - Sokolow, Susanne H.

PY - 2022/8

Y1 - 2022/8

N2 - As sustainable development practitioners have worked to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all” and “conserve life on land and below water”, what progress has been made with win–win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within and among solutions, highlighting opportunities for further research and adaptive implementation. Stakeholders seeking win–win interventions can explore this Review and an online database to find and tailor a relevant solution or brainstorm new solutions.

AB - As sustainable development practitioners have worked to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all” and “conserve life on land and below water”, what progress has been made with win–win interventions that reduce human infectious disease burdens while advancing conservation goals? Using a systematic literature review, we identified 46 proposed solutions, which we then investigated individually using targeted literature reviews. The proposed solutions addressed diverse conservation threats and human infectious diseases, and thus, the proposed interventions varied in scale, costs, and impacts. Some potential solutions had medium-quality to high-quality evidence for previous success in achieving proposed impacts in one or both sectors. However, there were notable evidence gaps within and among solutions, highlighting opportunities for further research and adaptive implementation. Stakeholders seeking win–win interventions can explore this Review and an online database to find and tailor a relevant solution or brainstorm new solutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135470567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135470567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

DO - 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 35932789

AN - SCOPUS:85135470567

SN - 2542-5196

VL - 6

SP - e694-e705

JO - The Lancet Planetary Health

JF - The Lancet Planetary Health

IS - 8

ER -

Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win–win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this