TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating optimal U for 3d transition-metal oxides within the SCAN+ U framework
AU - Long, Olivia Y.
AU - Sai Gautam, Gopalakrishnan
AU - Carter, Emily A.
N1 - Funding Information:
E.A.C. thanks the US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, under Award No. DE-EE0008090 for funding this project. O.L. acknowledges financial support from the Princeton Office of Undergraduate Research. The authors thank Princeton Research Computing resources at Princeton University, a consortium of groups including the Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering and the Princeton University Office of Information Technology's Research Computing department. The authors also acknowledge computational resources sponsored by the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy located at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Physical Society.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Redox-active 3d transition-metal oxides (TMOs) are crucial ingredients for multiple sustainable energy applications, including solar cells, batteries, catalysis, and solar thermochemical water splitting. However, any predictive modeling, such as that employing density functional theory, needs to describe accurately the energetics of redox reactions involving transition metals, if new candidate materials are to be identified in a reliable fashion. Recently, we demonstrated that the state-of-the-art, strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) exchange-correlation functional requires a Hubbard U correction (determined, e.g., from experimental oxidation enthalpies) to reproduce the ground-state structure, lattice parameters, magnetic moments, and electronic properties of Ce-, Mn-, and Fe-based oxides. In the present work, we extend our approach to identify optimal U values for other 3d TMOs, specifically Ti, V, Cr, Co, Ni, and Cu, within the SCAN+U framework. We determine optimal U values of 2.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 2.5 eV for Ti, V, Co, and Ni oxides, respectively, while Cr and Cu oxides best reproduce redox thermodynamics without any U correction at all. While the U values required for Ti, V, Co, and Ni are lower than those needed within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + U or local density approximation (LDA) + U approaches, inclusion of U makes non-negligible improvements in ground-state property evaluations of these oxides. Here we also validate our optimal U values by performing a number of transferability checks for each 3d material. A SCAN+U framework (with an appropriately determined U) therefore is needed to assess accurately the ground-state energies and qualitatively consistent electronic structures for (most) first-row TMOs.
AB - Redox-active 3d transition-metal oxides (TMOs) are crucial ingredients for multiple sustainable energy applications, including solar cells, batteries, catalysis, and solar thermochemical water splitting. However, any predictive modeling, such as that employing density functional theory, needs to describe accurately the energetics of redox reactions involving transition metals, if new candidate materials are to be identified in a reliable fashion. Recently, we demonstrated that the state-of-the-art, strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) exchange-correlation functional requires a Hubbard U correction (determined, e.g., from experimental oxidation enthalpies) to reproduce the ground-state structure, lattice parameters, magnetic moments, and electronic properties of Ce-, Mn-, and Fe-based oxides. In the present work, we extend our approach to identify optimal U values for other 3d TMOs, specifically Ti, V, Cr, Co, Ni, and Cu, within the SCAN+U framework. We determine optimal U values of 2.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 2.5 eV for Ti, V, Co, and Ni oxides, respectively, while Cr and Cu oxides best reproduce redox thermodynamics without any U correction at all. While the U values required for Ti, V, Co, and Ni are lower than those needed within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + U or local density approximation (LDA) + U approaches, inclusion of U makes non-negligible improvements in ground-state property evaluations of these oxides. Here we also validate our optimal U values by performing a number of transferability checks for each 3d material. A SCAN+U framework (with an appropriately determined U) therefore is needed to assess accurately the ground-state energies and qualitatively consistent electronic structures for (most) first-row TMOs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084654825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084654825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.045401
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.045401
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084654825
SN - 2475-9953
VL - 4
JO - Physical Review Materials
JF - Physical Review Materials
IS - 4
M1 - 045401
ER -