TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethnic and university identities across the college years
T2 - A common in-group identity perspective
AU - Levin, Shana
AU - Sinclair, Stacey
AU - Sidanius, Jim
AU - Van Laar, Colette
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The common in-group identity model advocates the creation of a superordinate group identity in order to reduce conflict between members of different ethnic subgroups. This study demonstrates that a university identity can serve as an effective common in-group identity for students from different ethnic groups. Longitudinal data were collected from an ethnically diverse sample of university students at the end of each year of college. Although ethnic identification tended to be correlated with status-legitimizing orientations and ideologies in a way that reinforces ethnic-status differences (i.e., these variables tended to be positively related for Whites but less so for ethnic minorities), the status-legitimizing variables were largely unrelated to university identification during each year in college. The longitudinal data also allowed us to examine these relationships over time. The relationships between ethnic and university identification and status-legitimizing orientations and ideologies did not change. Ethnic and university identities are discussed in terms of the common in-group identity model.
AB - The common in-group identity model advocates the creation of a superordinate group identity in order to reduce conflict between members of different ethnic subgroups. This study demonstrates that a university identity can serve as an effective common in-group identity for students from different ethnic groups. Longitudinal data were collected from an ethnically diverse sample of university students at the end of each year of college. Although ethnic identification tended to be correlated with status-legitimizing orientations and ideologies in a way that reinforces ethnic-status differences (i.e., these variables tended to be positively related for Whites but less so for ethnic minorities), the status-legitimizing variables were largely unrelated to university identification during each year in college. The longitudinal data also allowed us to examine these relationships over time. The relationships between ethnic and university identification and status-legitimizing orientations and ideologies did not change. Ethnic and university identities are discussed in terms of the common in-group identity model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349165313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349165313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01601.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01601.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:65349165313
SN - 0022-4537
VL - 65
SP - 287
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Social Issues
JF - Journal of Social Issues
IS - 2
ER -