TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimators of the human effective sex ratio detect sex biases on different timescales
AU - Emery, Leslie S.
AU - Felsenstein, Joseph
AU - Akey, Joshua M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Mike Hammer and Alon Keinan for providing data from their previous studies and Alon Keinan, Abigail Bigham, and members of the Akey lab for helpful discussions. We also acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments. This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant RO1GM078105 and an NIH/National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) Genome Training Grant. J.F.'s participation was funded by National Science Foundation grant 0814322 (P.I. Mary Kuhner) and by “life support” funding from the Department of Genome Sciences.
PY - 2010/12/10
Y1 - 2010/12/10
N2 - Determining historical sex ratios throughout human evolution can provide insight into patterns of genomic variation, the structure and composition of ancient populations, and the cultural factors that influence the sex ratio (e.g., sex-specific migration rates). Although numerous studies have suggested that unequal sex ratios have existed in human evolutionary history, a coherent picture of sex-biased processes has yet to emerge. For example, two recent studies compared human X chromosome to autosomal variation to make inferences about historical sex ratios but reached seemingly contradictory conclusions, with one study finding evidence for a male bias and the other study identifying a female bias. Here, we show that a large part of this discrepancy can be explained by methodological differences. Specifically, through reanalysis of empirical data, derivation of explicit analytical formulae, and extensive simulations we demonstrate that two estimators of the effective sex ratio based on population structure and nucleotide diversity preferentially detect biases that have occurred on different timescales. Our results clarify apparently contradictory evidence on the role of sex-biased processes in human evolutionary history and show that extant patterns of human genomic variation are consistent with both a recent male bias and an earlier, persistent female bias.
AB - Determining historical sex ratios throughout human evolution can provide insight into patterns of genomic variation, the structure and composition of ancient populations, and the cultural factors that influence the sex ratio (e.g., sex-specific migration rates). Although numerous studies have suggested that unequal sex ratios have existed in human evolutionary history, a coherent picture of sex-biased processes has yet to emerge. For example, two recent studies compared human X chromosome to autosomal variation to make inferences about historical sex ratios but reached seemingly contradictory conclusions, with one study finding evidence for a male bias and the other study identifying a female bias. Here, we show that a large part of this discrepancy can be explained by methodological differences. Specifically, through reanalysis of empirical data, derivation of explicit analytical formulae, and extensive simulations we demonstrate that two estimators of the effective sex ratio based on population structure and nucleotide diversity preferentially detect biases that have occurred on different timescales. Our results clarify apparently contradictory evidence on the role of sex-biased processes in human evolutionary history and show that extant patterns of human genomic variation are consistent with both a recent male bias and an earlier, persistent female bias.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649781938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649781938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 21109223
AN - SCOPUS:78649781938
SN - 0002-9297
VL - 87
SP - 848
EP - 856
JO - American Journal of Human Genetics
JF - American Journal of Human Genetics
IS - 6
ER -