Abstract
In the original paper (Newton et al. 2022), the reported planetary radii are incorrect and are too small by a factor of R (where R∗ = 0.79 ± 0.04R⊙). In Table 8 of Newton et al. (2022), the values reported as RP/R⊙ are in units of RP/R⊙. The planetary radius in Earth radii quoted in the abstract and the final paragraph of the paper (2.1 ± 0.2R⊕) is correctly RP = 2.6 ± 0.2R⊕. In Table 8, the value for the column "ω fixed"is RP R⊕ 2.59-0.16+0.17 and for the column "ω free"is RP R⊕ 2.61-0.16+0.17 . The planet still falls within the range of radii typical for both field and young mini-Neptunes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 136 |
| Journal | Astronomical Journal |
| Volume | 165 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Mar 1 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: TESS Hunt for Young and Maturing Exoplanets (THYME). VII. Membership, Rotation, and Lithium in the Young Cluster Group-X and a New Young Exoplanet (The Astronomical Journal (2022) 164 (119) DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8154)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver