In the original paper (Newton et al. 2022), the reported planetary radii are incorrect and are too small by a factor of R (where R∗ = 0.79 ± 0.04R⊙). In Table 8 of Newton et al. (2022), the values reported as RP/R⊙ are in units of RP/R⊙. The planetary radius in Earth radii quoted in the abstract and the final paragraph of the paper (2.1 ± 0.2R⊕) is correctly RP = 2.6 ± 0.2R⊕. In Table 8, the value for the column "ω fixed"is RP R⊕ 2.59-0.16+0.17 and for the column "ω free"is RP R⊕ 2.61-0.16+0.17 . The planet still falls within the range of radii typical for both field and young mini-Neptunes.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science