TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19 (PLoS ONE (2020) 15:10 (e0240775) Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240775)
AU - Gray, Nicholas
AU - Calleja, Dominic
AU - Wimbush, Alexander
AU - Miralles-Dolz, Enrique
AU - Gray, Ander
AU - de Angelis, Marco
AU - Derrer-Merk, Elfriede
AU - Oparaji, Bright Uchenna
AU - Stepanov, Vladimir
AU - Clearkin, Louis
AU - Ferson, Scott
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Gray et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775
AB - The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101424334
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101424334#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0247129
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0247129
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 33566807
AN - SCOPUS:85101424334
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 16
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 2 February
M1 - e0247129
ER -