Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

A. J. Shajib; S. Birrer; T. Treu; M. W. Auger; A. Agnello; T. Anguita; E. J. Buckley-Geer; J. H.H. Chan; T. E. Collett; F. Courbin; C. D. Fassnacht; J. Frieman; I. Kayo; C. Lemon; H. Lin; P. J. Marshall; R. McMahon; A. More; N. D. Morgan; V. Motta; M. Oguri; F. Ostrovski; C. E. Rusu; P. L. Schechter; T. Shanks; S. H. Suyu; G. Meylan; T. M.C. Abbott; S. Allam; J. Annis; S. Avila; E. Bertin; D. Brooks; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; C. E. Cunha; L. N. Da Costa; J. De Vicente; S. Desai; P. Doel; B. Flaugher; P. Fosalba; J. García-Bellido; D. W. Gerdes; D. Gruen; R. A. Gruendl; G. Gutierrez; W. G. Hartley; D. L. Hollowood; B. Hoyle; D. J. James; K. Kuehn; N. Kuropatkin; O. Lahav; M. Lima; M. A.G. Maia; M. March; J. L. Marshall; P. Melchior; F. Menanteau; R. Miquel; A. A. Plazas; E. Sanchez; V. Scarpine; I. Sevilla-Noarbe; M. Smith; M. Soares-Santos; F. Sobreira; E. Suchyta; M. E.C. Swanson; G. Tarle; A. R. Walker

doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

A. J. Shajib, S. Birrer, T. Treu, M. W. Auger, A. Agnello, T. Anguita, E. J. Buckley-Geer, J. H.H. Chan, T. E. Collett, F. Courbin, C. D. Fassnacht, J. Frieman, I. Kayo, C. Lemon, H. Lin, P. J. Marshall, R. McMahon, A. More, N. D. Morgan, V. MottaM. Oguri, F. Ostrovski, C. E. Rusu, P. L. Schechter, T. Shanks, S. H. Suyu, G. Meylan, T. M.C. Abbott, S. Allam, J. Annis, S. Avila, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, C. E. Cunha, L. N. Da Costa, J. De Vicente, S. Desai, P. Doel, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, J. García-Bellido, D. W. Gerdes, D. Gruen, R. A. Gruendl, G. Gutierrez, W. G. Hartley, D. L. Hollowood, B. Hoyle, D. J. James, K. Kuehn, N. Kuropatkin, O. Lahav, M. Lima, M. A.G. Maia, M. March, J. L. Marshall, P. Melchior, F. Menanteau, R. Miquel, A. A. Plazas, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, M. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, F. Sobreira, E. Suchyta, M. E.C. Swanson, G. Tarle, A. R. Walker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2833-2835
Number of pages	3
Journal	Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume	501
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562
State	Published - Feb 1 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Astronomy and Astrophysics
Space and Planetary Science

Keywords

errata, addenda
galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD
galaxies: structure
gravitational lensing: strong
methods: data analysis

Access to Document

10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Shajib, A. J., Birrer, S., Treu, T., Auger, M. W., Agnello, A., Anguita, T., Buckley-Geer, E. J., Chan, J. H. H., Collett, T. E., Courbin, F., Fassnacht, C. D., Frieman, J., Kayo, I., Lemon, C., Lin, H., Marshall, P. J., McMahon, R., More, A., Morgan, N. D., ... Walker, A. R. (2021). Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501(2), 2833-2835. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562

@article{baf2971419ea43919ae12b136d813664,

title = "Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)",

abstract = "The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.",

keywords = "errata, addenda, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: structure, gravitational lensing: strong, methods: data analysis",

author = "Shajib, {A. J.} and S. Birrer and T. Treu and Auger, {M. W.} and A. Agnello and T. Anguita and Buckley-Geer, {E. J.} and Chan, {J. H.H.} and Collett, {T. E.} and F. Courbin and Fassnacht, {C. D.} and J. Frieman and I. Kayo and C. Lemon and H. Lin and Marshall, {P. J.} and R. McMahon and A. More and Morgan, {N. D.} and V. Motta and M. Oguri and F. Ostrovski and Rusu, {C. E.} and Schechter, {P. L.} and T. Shanks and Suyu, {S. H.} and G. Meylan and Abbott, {T. M.C.} and S. Allam and J. Annis and S. Avila and E. Bertin and D. Brooks and {Carnero Rosell}, A. and {Carrasco Kind}, M. and J. Carretero and Cunha, {C. E.} and {Da Costa}, {L. N.} and {De Vicente}, J. and S. Desai and P. Doel and B. Flaugher and P. Fosalba and J. Garc{\'i}a-Bellido and Gerdes, {D. W.} and D. Gruen and Gruendl, {R. A.} and G. Gutierrez and Hartley, {W. G.} and Hollowood, {D. L.} and B. Hoyle and James, {D. J.} and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and O. Lahav and M. Lima and Maia, {M. A.G.} and M. March and Marshall, {J. L.} and P. Melchior and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and Plazas, {A. A.} and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and F. Sobreira and E. Suchyta and Swanson, {M. E.C.} and G. Tarle and Walker, {A. R.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/mnras/staa3562",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "501",

pages = "2833--2835",

journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",

issn = "0035-8711",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

Shajib, AJ, Birrer, S, Treu, T, Auger, MW, Agnello, A, Anguita, T, Buckley-Geer, EJ, Chan, JHH, Collett, TE, Courbin, F, Fassnacht, CD, Frieman, J, Kayo, I, Lemon, C, Lin, H, Marshall, PJ, McMahon, R, More, A, Morgan, ND, Motta, V, Oguri, M, Ostrovski, F, Rusu, CE, Schechter, PL, Shanks, T, Suyu, SH, Meylan, G, Abbott, TMC, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bertin, E, Brooks, D, Carnero Rosell, A, Carrasco Kind, M, Carretero, J, Cunha, CE, Da Costa, LN, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Doel, P, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, García-Bellido, J, Gerdes, DW, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gutierrez, G, Hartley, WG, Hollowood, DL, Hoyle, B, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, March, M, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Plazas, AA, Sanchez, E, Scarpine, V, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Smith, M, Soares-Santos, M, Sobreira, F, Suchyta, E, Swanson, MEC, Tarle, G & Walker, AR 2021, 'Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 501, no. 2, pp. 2833-2835. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). / Shajib, A. J.; Birrer, S.; Treu, T. et al.
In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 501, No. 2, 01.02.2021, p. 2833-2835.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

AU - Shajib, A. J.

AU - Birrer, S.

AU - Treu, T.

AU - Auger, M. W.

AU - Agnello, A.

AU - Anguita, T.

AU - Buckley-Geer, E. J.

AU - Chan, J. H.H.

AU - Collett, T. E.

AU - Courbin, F.

AU - Fassnacht, C. D.

AU - Frieman, J.

AU - Kayo, I.

AU - Lemon, C.

AU - Lin, H.

AU - Marshall, P. J.

AU - McMahon, R.

AU - More, A.

AU - Morgan, N. D.

AU - Motta, V.

AU - Oguri, M.

AU - Ostrovski, F.

AU - Rusu, C. E.

AU - Schechter, P. L.

AU - Shanks, T.

AU - Suyu, S. H.

AU - Meylan, G.

AU - Abbott, T. M.C.

AU - Allam, S.

AU - Annis, J.

AU - Avila, S.

AU - Bertin, E.

AU - Brooks, D.

AU - Carnero Rosell, A.

AU - Carrasco Kind, M.

AU - Carretero, J.

AU - Cunha, C. E.

AU - Da Costa, L. N.

AU - De Vicente, J.

AU - Desai, S.

AU - Doel, P.

AU - Flaugher, B.

AU - Fosalba, P.

AU - García-Bellido, J.

AU - Gerdes, D. W.

AU - Gruen, D.

AU - Gruendl, R. A.

AU - Gutierrez, G.

AU - Hartley, W. G.

AU - Hollowood, D. L.

AU - Hoyle, B.

AU - James, D. J.

AU - Kuehn, K.

AU - Kuropatkin, N.

AU - Lahav, O.

AU - Lima, M.

AU - Maia, M. A.G.

AU - March, M.

AU - Marshall, J. L.

AU - Melchior, P.

AU - Menanteau, F.

AU - Miquel, R.

AU - Plazas, A. A.

AU - Sanchez, E.

AU - Scarpine, V.

AU - Sevilla-Noarbe, I.

AU - Smith, M.

AU - Soares-Santos, M.

AU - Sobreira, F.

AU - Suchyta, E.

AU - Swanson, M. E.C.

AU - Tarle, G.

AU - Walker, A. R.

PY - 2021/2/1

Y1 - 2021/2/1

N2 - The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

AB - The paper 'Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars' was published inMNRAS, 483, 4, 5649-5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.

KW - errata, addenda

KW - galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD

KW - galaxies: structure

KW - gravitational lensing: strong

KW - methods: data analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100451513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100451513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

DO - 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85100451513

SN - 0035-8711

VL - 501

SP - 2833

EP - 2835

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

IS - 2

ER -

Shajib AJ, Birrer S, Treu T, Auger MW, Agnello A, Anguita T et al. Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2021 Feb 1;501(2):2833-2835. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3562

Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars(Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2019) 483:4 (5649–5671) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3397)

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this