Erratum: Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments (British Journal of Political Science (2018) DOI: 10.1017/S0007123418000327)

Andrew Guess, Alexander Coppock

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Andrew Guess and Alexander Coppock doi:10.1017/S0007123418000327, Published by Cambridge University Press, 5 November 2018. The authors apologise for a coding error which affected Table 1 in the published article. It caused the reported standard deviations of each treatment group, and their standard errors, to be inaccurate. Please find below the corrected table.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1517
Number of pages1
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments (British Journal of Political Science (2018) DOI: 10.1017/S0007123418000327)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this