Abstract
Knox et al. (2020) contained an error in the description of a numeric result. In describing a result in Table 1, the article stated: "For example, while the approach in Fryer (2019) implies a statistically insignificant 2.4 instances per 1,000 encounters of pushing Hispanic suspects to a wall due to suspect race, our revised estimate shows the true number is at least 26-eleven times larger." This line should have read: "For example, while the approach in Fryer (2019) implies a statistically insignificant 2.4 instances per 1,000 encounters of pushing Hispanic suspects to a wall due to suspect race, our revised estimate shows the true number is at least 22-nine times larger." Thus, while estimates in Table 1 remain correct, the main-Text discussion erroneously referred to the wrong entry in the table. The authors regret the error.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1394 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | American Political Science Review |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing (American Political Science Review (2020) 114: 3 (619-637) DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000039)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver