Equality versus priority: How relevant is the distinction?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations


This paper questions the distinction between egalitarianism and prioritarianism, arguing that it is important to separate the reasons for particular social preferences from the contents of these preferences, that it is possible to like equality and separability simultaneously, and that some egalitarians and prioritarians may therefore share the same social preferences (though for different reasons). The case of risky prospects, for which Broome has proposed an interesting example meant to show that egalitarians and prioritarians cannot share the same preferences, is scrutinized. The levelling down objection is also examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-217
Number of pages15
JournalEconomics and Philosophy
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 7 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics


  • Equality
  • priority
  • risk
  • separability


Dive into the research topics of 'Equality versus priority: How relevant is the distinction?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this