Abstract
The normative foundations of the environmental movement can be thought of in a range of different ways. The present paper is a commentary on very interesting papers by Thomas Dunlap, Thomas Hill and Kimberly Smith, who take up the spiritual, ethical and political perspectives respectively. Their accounts are described and evaluated.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 355-363 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Environmental Values |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Environmental Science
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Death of environmentalism
- Eckersley
- Environmental movement
- Intrinsic value
- Leopold
- Middle-level values
- Mutual accountability
- Nature
- Nordhaus
- Plural values
- Rawls
- Religion
- Scanlon
- Schellenberger
- Social contract