TY - CHAP
T1 - Engaging with christianity
AU - Singer, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Para Nancy lo que se anuncia el 68 es el fin no solamente de la “época de las concepciones del mundo” sino también del trazado de horizontes, la determinación de objetivos y la previsión operativa, el abandono, en definitiva de la era de la historia, o “ya no una historia en la cual fuésemos los sujetos, sino una historia que nos sorprendiera y nos arrebatara” (Ibíd.: 65), que es para Nancy inseparable del evento, “el evento sorprende o no es un evento” (Nancy 2000a: 97). En el 68, de diversas maneras, se abandonaba el régimen de la “concepción” para abrir otro régimen de pensamiento: ya no más formas encargadas de modelar un dato histórico preformado como “progreso” y de inspeccionar las cosas en nombre de la razón. Lo que cuenta es esta verdad: que la autoridad no puede ser definida por ninguna autorización previa y solo puede proceder de un deseo que se expresa o reconoce en ella. La democracia no debe disponer de autoridad alguna identificada a partir de un lugar diferente a un deseo en el cual se exprese y reconozca una verdadera posibilidad de ser todos juntos en común. La comunidad no es un ser en común sino un ser en común, estar uno con otro. Lo que significa que puedo decir “yo” solo si puedo decir “nosotros”, la alteridad consiste en la no presencia a sí: “Somos otros –cada uno para el otro y cada uno para sí– por el nacimiento y la muerte que exponen nuestra finitud o que hoy exponen a la finitud” (Nancy 2000: 176).
Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press, 2014 and Peter Singer, 2014.
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - An autobiographical introduction Since this chapter originated at a conference about Christian ethics engaging with Peter Singer, I thought it might be appropriate to begin by telling you about Peter Singer’s engagement with Christianity. I grew up in Melbourne, Australia, in a home with a Jewish cultural background but no Jewish religious belief. I can’t recall a time when I believed in God. I suppose there were times when I was an agnostic, rather than an atheist, because sometimes during my childhood or early teenage years it seemed to me an interesting speculation that there might be some kind of personal force behind the existence of the universe, but for the overwhelming majority of my life, that possibility has seemed to me sufficiently implausible for me to accept the label ‘atheist’. I have one positive and two negative reasons for my atheism. The positive reason is the one reputed to have been uttered by Laplace, when Napoleon asked him where God figured in his account of the cosmos: ‘I had no need of that hypothesis.’ In other words, the world seems sufficiently explicable without positing a God, or at least no more explicable if we do posit one, so why add one? The first negative reason is that, although I live in a society in which most religious believers are Christians, it is obvious that they did not come to that belief independently of being brought up in Christian families. I don’t know anyone who grew up in a Jewish family who became a Christian (with the exception of some relatives who grew up in Austria before the war and took on a Christian identity in an attempt to escape anti-Semitism) and I know only one or two people who grew up in Christian families and converted to Judaism, and they did so when they fell in love with a person who was Jewish. On the other hand, I know many people who grew up in both Jewish and Christian families who are no longer religious believers.
AB - An autobiographical introduction Since this chapter originated at a conference about Christian ethics engaging with Peter Singer, I thought it might be appropriate to begin by telling you about Peter Singer’s engagement with Christianity. I grew up in Melbourne, Australia, in a home with a Jewish cultural background but no Jewish religious belief. I can’t recall a time when I believed in God. I suppose there were times when I was an agnostic, rather than an atheist, because sometimes during my childhood or early teenage years it seemed to me an interesting speculation that there might be some kind of personal force behind the existence of the universe, but for the overwhelming majority of my life, that possibility has seemed to me sufficiently implausible for me to accept the label ‘atheist’. I have one positive and two negative reasons for my atheism. The positive reason is the one reputed to have been uttered by Laplace, when Napoleon asked him where God figured in his account of the cosmos: ‘I had no need of that hypothesis.’ In other words, the world seems sufficiently explicable without positing a God, or at least no more explicable if we do posit one, so why add one? The first negative reason is that, although I live in a society in which most religious believers are Christians, it is obvious that they did not come to that belief independently of being brought up in Christian families. I don’t know anyone who grew up in a Jewish family who became a Christian (with the exception of some relatives who grew up in Austria before the war and took on a Christian identity in an attempt to escape anti-Semitism) and I know only one or two people who grew up in Christian families and converted to Judaism, and they did so when they fell in love with a person who was Jewish. On the other hand, I know many people who grew up in both Jewish and Christian families who are no longer religious believers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923450763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923450763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107279629.004
DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107279629.004
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84923450763
SN - 9781107050754
SP - 53
EP - 67
BT - God, the Good, and Utilitarianism
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -