### Abstract

Although competition between plants is usually asymmetric (i.e. larger plants have a disproportionate effect on smaller plants) almost all models of plant competition at the local level have assumed symmetric competition. We add a simple version of competitive asymmetry to the local density neighborhood models of plant interference and population dynamics developed by Pacala & Silander (1985, Am. Nat.125, 385-411; 1987, Oikos48, 217-224) by assuming that plants within a neighborhood can be put in a linear dominance hierarchy based upon their initial size. The size of a focal plant is a function of the number of dominant and the number of subordinate neighbors within its neighborhood, with subordinate neighbors having less of an effect than dominant ones. Asymmetry prevents precipitous changes in focal plant size with changes in local density, making the relationship between focal plant size and local density hyperbolic, even if the symmetric model is not hyperbolic. Thus, asymmetry makes the model conform to the law of constant final yield, irrespective of the form of the relationship between plant size and local crowding. Asymmetry also prevents population dynamic oscillations in the model in cases in which it would occur in the absence of asymmetry. The results show that asymmetry has major effects on a model of local interference in plants, and point to the importance of including it in such models.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 165-179 |

Number of pages | 15 |

Journal | Journal of Theoretical Biology |

Volume | 149 |

Issue number | 2 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Mar 21 1991 |

### All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

- Statistics and Probability
- Modeling and Simulation
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
- Immunology and Microbiology(all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Applied Mathematics

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

*Journal of Theoretical Biology*,

*149*(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80275-9