TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights
AU - Clark, Chelsey S.
AU - Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
AU - Westwood, Sean J.
AU - Sen, Maya
AU - Malhotra, Neil
AU - Jessee, Stephen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Previous research focused on popular US Supreme Court rulings expanding rights; however, less is known about rulings running against prevailing public opinion and restricting rights. We examine the impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization opinion, which overturned Roe v. Wade’s (1973) constitutional protection of abortion rights. A three-wave survey panel (5,489 interviews) conducted before the leak of the drafted Dobbs opinion, after the leak, and after the official opinion release, and cross-sectional data from these three time points (10,107 interviews) show that the ruling directly influenced views about the constitutional legality of abortion and fetal viability. However, personal opinions were not directly influenced and perceived social norms shifted away from the ruling, meaning that individuals perceived greater public support for abortion. We argue that extensive coverage of opposition to overturning Roe v. Wade supported this shift. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization also caused large changes, polarized by party identification, in opinions about the Supreme Court.
AB - Previous research focused on popular US Supreme Court rulings expanding rights; however, less is known about rulings running against prevailing public opinion and restricting rights. We examine the impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization opinion, which overturned Roe v. Wade’s (1973) constitutional protection of abortion rights. A three-wave survey panel (5,489 interviews) conducted before the leak of the drafted Dobbs opinion, after the leak, and after the official opinion release, and cross-sectional data from these three time points (10,107 interviews) show that the ruling directly influenced views about the constitutional legality of abortion and fetal viability. However, personal opinions were not directly influenced and perceived social norms shifted away from the ruling, meaning that individuals perceived greater public support for abortion. We argue that extensive coverage of opposition to overturning Roe v. Wade supported this shift. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization also caused large changes, polarized by party identification, in opinions about the Supreme Court.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176281578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176281578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41562-023-01708-4
DO - 10.1038/s41562-023-01708-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 37945806
AN - SCOPUS:85176281578
SN - 2397-3374
VL - 8
SP - 63
EP - 71
JO - Nature Human Behaviour
JF - Nature Human Behaviour
IS - 1
ER -