Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity

Benjamin Gilbert, Jonathan M. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

116 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ecological drift causes species abundances to fluctuate randomly, lowering diversity within communities and increasing differences among otherwise equivalent communities. Despite broad interest in ecological drift, ecologists have little experimental evidence of its consequences in nature, where competitive forces modulate species abundances. We manipulated drift by imposing 40-fold variation in the size of experimentally assembled annual plant communities and holding their edge-to-interior ratios comparable. Drift over three generations was greater than predicted by neutral models, causing high extinction rates and fast divergence in composition among smaller communities. Competitive asymmetries drove populations of most species to small enough sizes that demographic stochasticity could markedly influence dynamics, increasing the importance of drift in communities. The strong effects of drift occurred despite stabilizing niche differences, which cause species to have greater population growth rates when at low local abundance. Overall, the importance of ecological drift appears greater in non-neutral communities than previously recognized, and varies with community size and the type and strength of density dependence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20170507
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume284
Issue number1855
DOIs
StatePublished - May 31 2017
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Immunology and Microbiology
  • General Environmental Science
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Demographic stochasticity
  • Extinction
  • Neutral theory
  • Stability
  • β diversity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this