Dynamics of mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in the native and introduced range of the host

André A. Dhondt, Alexander V. Badyaev, Andrew P. Dobson, Dana M. Hawley, Melanie J.L. Driscoll, Wesley M. Hochachka, David H. Ley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 1994, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, a common bacterial poultry pathogen, caused an epidemic in house finches in the eastern part of their North American range where the species had been introduced in the 1940s. Birds with mycoplasmal conjunctivitis were reported across the entire eastern United States within 3-4 years. Here we track the course of the Mycoplasma gallisepticum epidemic as it reached native, western North American populations of the house finch. In 2002, Mycoplasma gallisepticum was first observed in a native house finch population in Missoula, MT, where it gradually increased in prevalence during the next 2 years. Concurrently, house finches with conjunctivitis were reported with increasing number in the Pacific Northwest. In native populations of the host, the epidemic expanded more slowly, and reached lower levels of prevalence than in the eastern, introduced range of the species. Maximal prevalence was about half in the Missoula population than in local populations in the East. Although many factors can contribute to these differences, we argue that it is most likely the higher genetic heterogeneity in western than in eastern populations caused the lower impact of the pathogen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-102
Number of pages8
JournalEcoHealth
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Keywords

  • Carpodacus mexicanus
  • Epidemic
  • Genetic bottleneck
  • House Finch Disease Survey
  • House finch
  • Mycoplasma gallisepticum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamics of mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in the native and introduced range of the host'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this